Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753662›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2020

Impact of a novel oral health promotion program on routine oral hygiene among socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers: results from a randomized semi-pragmatic trial.

Jennifer B McClure, Melissa L Anderson, Chloe Krakauer, Paula Blasi, Terry Bush, Jennifer Nelson, Sheryl L Catz

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer B McClureKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly, Group Health Research Institute), Seattle, WA, USA.
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly, Group Health Research Institute), Seattle, WA, USA.
Chloe KrakauerDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Paula BlasiKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly, Group Health Research Institute), Seattle, WA, USA.
Terry BushOptum Center for Wellbeing Research, Optum, Eden Prairie, MN.
Jennifer NelsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (formerly, Group Health Research Institute), Seattle, WA, USA.
Sheryl L CatzBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

Oral Health 4 Life: Promoting Oral Health among Tobacco Quitline CallersU01DE024462 · NIDCR · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI MCCLURE, JENNIFER B · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE024462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smokers are at high risk of oral disease and report sub-optimal oral hygiene. Improving smokers' oral hygiene could reduce their future disease risk. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of a novel, multi-modal oral health promotion program (Oral Health 4 Life; OH4L) targeted to socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers and delivered through state-funded tobacco quitlines. Smokers (n = 718) were randomized to standard quitline care or standard care plus OH4L. OH4L recipients received a comprehensive behavioral intervention and were advised of the benefits of routine oral hygiene, encouraged to brush and floss daily (for better oral health and to manage cigarette cravings), and provided a toothbrush and floss. Participants were followed for 6 months to assess the intervention effects on routine oral hygiene (brushing and flossing) and changes in motivation and self-efficacy. Data were collected between 2015 and 2017. At 2-month follow-up, OH4L participants were more likely to meet the American Dental Association (ADA) recommendations for brushing twice daily (adjusted RR = 1.15 [1.04, 1.27], p = .006), flossing daily (adjusted RR = 1.20 [1.03, 1.39], p = .02), and for both brushing and flossing (adjusted RR = 1.33 [1.10, 1.61], p = .003). Daily flossing was more likely at 6-month follow-up (adjusted RR = 1.21 [1.04, 1.42], p = .02) among OH4L participants. The change in self-efficacy and motivation for daily flossing from baseline to 2 months was significantly greater among OH4L participants and mediated the intervention effect on flossing at 6 months. Integrating oral hygiene promotion with standard tobacco quitline services improved oral health self-care.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOral HealthFemaleHumansOral HygieneSmokersUnited StatesVulnerable PopulationsFlossingOral healthOral hygieneSelf-efficacy and MotivationSmokingTooth brushing

Identifiers

PMID30753662
PMCPMC7237541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.