Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753648›Full record

Trial reportSleep2019

Differential effects of split and continuous sleep on neurobehavioral function and glucose tolerance in sleep-restricted adolescents.

June C Lo, Derek C K Twan, Swathy Karamchedu, Xuan Kai Lee, Ju Lynn Ong, Elaine Van Rijn, Joshua J Gooley, Michael W L Chee

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03333512 (The Cognitive and Metabolic Effects of Sleep Restriction in Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03333512 nacompletednot on this map

The Cognitive and Metabolic Effects of Sleep Restriction in Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolRan2017 to 2018Enrolled59ConditionsSleep, Sleep RestrictionArmsNap
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

June C LoCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Derek C K TwanCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Swathy KaramcheduCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Xuan Kai LeeCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Ju Lynn OngCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Elaine Van RijnCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Joshua J GooleyCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Michael W L CheeCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesMany adolescents are exposed to sleep restriction on school nights. We assessed how different apportionment of restricted sleep (continuous vs. split sleep) influences neurobehavioral function and glucose levels.

methodsAdolescents, aged 15-19 years, were evaluated in a dormitory setting using a parallel-group design. Following two baseline nights of 9-hour time-in-bed (TIB), participants underwent either 5 nights of continuous 6.5-h TIB (n = 29) or 5-hour nocturnal TIB with a 1.5-hour afternoon nap (n = 29). After two recovery nights of 9-hour TIB, participants were sleep restricted for another three nights. Sleep was assessed using polysomnography (PSG). Cognitive performance and mood were evaluated three times per day. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were conducted on mornings after baseline sleep, recovery sleep, and the third day of each sleep restriction cycle.

resultsThe split sleep group had fewer vigilance lapses, better working memory and executive function, faster processing speed, lower level of subjective sleepiness, and more positive mood, even though PSG-verified total sleep time was less than the continuous sleep group. However, vigilance in both sleep-restricted groups was inferior to adolescents in a prior sample given 9-hour nocturnal TIB. During both cycles of sleep restriction, blood glucose during the OGTT increased by a greater amount in the split sleep schedule compared with persons receiving 6.5-hour continuous sleep.

conclusionsIn adolescents, modest multinight sleep restriction had divergent negative effects on cognitive performance and glucose levels depending on how the restricted sleep was apportioned. They are best advised to obtain the recommended amount of nocturnal sleep.

trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03333512.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAffectAttentionExecutive FunctionFemaleGlucoseHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMemory, Short-TermPolysomnographySleepSleep DeprivationTime FactorsWakefulnessGlucoseadolescentscognitioncontinuous sleepglucose tolerancepartial sleep deprivationsleep restrictionsplit sleepvigilance

Identifiers

PMID30753648
PMCPMC6519912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.