Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753579›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2019

Recent developments and future directions in adult lower-grade gliomas: Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus.

David Schiff, Martin Van den Bent, Michael A Vogelbaum, Wolfgang Wick, C Ryan Miller, Martin Taphoorn, Whitney Pope, Paul D Brown, Michael Platten, Rakesh Jalali and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for grade 2 gliomas (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

David SchiffDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Martin Van den BentDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael A VogelbaumDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Wolfgang WickDivison of Neuro-Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
C Ryan MillerPathology and Lab Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Martin TaphoornDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Whitney PopeSection of Neuroradiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael PlattenDepartment of Neurology, Mannheim University Hospital, Mannheim, Germany.
Rakesh JalaliApollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
Terri ArmstrongNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Patrick Y WenCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Apollo Proton Cancer Centre · INCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLHeidelberg University · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLMayo Clinic · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Yvonne Yu-Hsuan Chen · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The finding that most grades II and III gliomas harbor isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations conveying a relatively favorable and fairly similar prognosis in both tumor grades highlights that these tumors represent a fundamentally different entity from IDH wild-type gliomas exemplified in most glioblastoma. Herein we review the most recent developments in molecular neuropathology leading to reclassification of these tumors based upon IDH and 1p/19q status, as well as the potential roles of methylation profiling and deletional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A and 2B. We discuss the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, benefit of surgical resection, and neuroimaging features of lower-grade gliomas as they relate to molecular subtype, including advanced imaging techniques such as 2-hydroxyglutarate magnetic resonance spectroscopy and amino acid PET scanning. Recent, ongoing, and planned studies of radiation therapy and both cytotoxic and targeted chemotherapies are summarized, including both small molecule and immunotherapy approaches specifically targeting the mutant IDH protein.

Indexed as

AdultBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyEuropeGliomaHumansNeoplasm GradingNeuroimagingPrognosisSocieties, MedicalastrocytomagliomaIDH mutationlower-gradeoligodendroglioma

Identifiers

PMID30753579
PMCPMC6620638
OpenAlexW2939093001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.