Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753468›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2019

Parental time to pregnancy, medically assisted reproduction and pubertal development in boys and girls.

A Ernst, L L B Lauridsen, N Brix, O A Arah, J Olsen, L H Olsen, C H Ramlau-Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparing adolescent self staging of pubertal development with hormone biomarkers.Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A ErnstDepartment of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus C, Denmark.
L L B LauridsenDepartment of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus C, Denmark.
N BrixDepartment of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus C, Denmark.
O A ArahDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J OlsenDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), 650 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
L H OlsenDepartment of Urology, Section for Paediatric Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 35, Aarhus N, Denmark.
C H Ramlau-HansenDepartment of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes parental fertility, measured by time to pregnancy (TTP), or use of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) affect pubertal development in the offspring? SUMMARY ANSWER: Neither TTP nor type of MAR treatment had clinically relevant implications for mean age at achieving individual pubertal milestones or overall timing of puberty in boys and girls. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Parental TTP and MAR have been associated with impaired semen quality in adult sons. Timing of puberty reflects earlier signals of reproductive health, but it remains unclear whether parental fertility or MAR affects pubertal development, especially in the growing generation of children conceived by IVF or ICSI. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In this study, 15 819 children born by mothers in the Danish National Birth Cohort from 2000 to 2003 participated in a nationwide puberty cohort (participation rate = 70%). Parental TTP and use of MAR were reported by mothers in early pregnancy and children's pubertal development data was self-recorded in web-based questionnaires from 11 years of age and 6 monthly throughout puberty (2012-2018). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsPubertal development in children (of planned pregnancies, n = 13 285) born by untreated subfecund (TTP: 6-12 months) (n =2038), untreated severely subfeund (TTP: >12 months) (n = 1242), treated subfecund (n = 230) and treated severely subfecund (n = 1234) parents were compared to children born to more fertile parents (TTP: ≤5 months). We estimated mean monthly differences in mean age at achieving individual pubertal milestones (i.e. age at menarche, voice break, first ejaculation and Tanner stages 2, 3, 4 and 5 for breast or genital development and pubic hair growth) and a combined indicator of timing of puberty. Further, we compared mean age at achieving the individual pubertal milestones in children born by use of IVF or ICSI (n = 480) with children born by controlled ovarian stimulation or ovulation induction with or without intrauterine insemination (n = 902). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We found tendencies towards slightly later mean age at male pubertal timing and slightly earlier mean age at female pubertal timing among children born by untreated subfecund, treated subfecund, untreated severely subfecund and treated severely subfecund parents. There were no specific patterns with increasing TTP, use of MAR nor type of MAR treatment, and the magnitude of the mean differences for individual milestones and overall timing of puberty were small, i.e. 0.9 months (95% CI: -1.0; 2.8) for first ejaculation and -0.5 months (95% CI: -2.0; 1.0) months for age at menarche in boys and girls, respectively, born by treated severely subfecund parents when compared with children born by more fertile parents. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Non-differential misclassification of the self-reported information on parental TTP and pubertal development in the offspring may serve as an alternative explanation of the findings, possibly biasing the estimates towards the null. The information on pubertal development was collected from around 11 years of age and onwards. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis study adds to the growing body of literature suggesting only limited harmful effects of parental subfecundity and MAR on offspring's long-term growth and development. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF 4183-00152]; and the Faculty of Health at Aarhus University. The authors have no financial relationships or competing interests to disclose.

Indexed as

Ovulation InductionSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTime-to-PregnancyAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentAdultChildChild DevelopmentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMenarcheMothersPregnancycohort studymedically assisted reproductionprenatal exposure delayed effectspubertysex characteristicstanner stagestime to pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30753468
PMCPMC6443115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.