Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753283›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2019

A high-throughput method for unbiased quantitation and categorization of nuclear morphology†.

Benjamin Matthew Skinner, Claudia Cattoni Rathje, Joanne Bacon, Emma Elizabeth Philippa Johnson, Erica Lee Larson, Emily E K Kopania, Jeffrey Martin Good, Gullalaii Yousafzai, Nabeel Ahmed Affara, Peter James Ivor Ellis

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effect of Probiotics on Sperm Quality in the Adult Mouse.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. AnBiomicrofluidics · 2024
    Article
  14. Genetic mutation ofLife science alliance · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin Matthew SkinnerDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Claudia Cattoni RathjeSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Joanne BaconDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Emma Elizabeth Philippa JohnsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Erica Lee LarsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Emily E K KopaniaDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, MT, USA.
Jeffrey Martin GoodDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, MT, USA.
Gullalaii YousafzaiSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Nabeel Ahmed AffaraDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter James Ivor EllisSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of Montana · USUniversity of Denver · US

Funding

Evolutionary and Functional Genetics of Male Reproduction using Wild Mice as a MoR01GM098536 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DEAN, MATTHEW D · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and the developmental basis of hybrid male stR01HD073439 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI GOOD, JEFFREY · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
The evolution of genomic imprintingR01HD094787 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI GOOD, JEFFREY · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L502443/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000129/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000463/1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073439NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094787NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physical arrangement of chromatin in the nucleus is cell type and species-specific, a fact particularly evident in sperm, in which most of the cytoplasm has been lost. Analysis of the characteristic falciform ("hook shaped") sperm in mice is important in studies of sperm development, hybrid sterility, infertility, and toxicology. However, quantification of sperm shape differences typically relies on subjective manual assessment, rendering comparisons within and between samples difficult. We have developed an analysis program for morphometric analysis of asymmetric nuclei and characterized the sperm of mice from a range of inbred, outbred, and wild-derived mouse strains. We find that laboratory strains have elevated sperm shape variability both within and between samples in comparison to wild-derived inbred strains, and that sperm shape in F1 offspring from a cross between CBA and C57Bl6J strains is subtly affected by the direction of the cross. We further show that hierarchical clustering can discriminate distinct sperm shapes with greater efficiency and reproducibility than even experienced manual assessors, and is useful both to distinguish between samples and also to identify different morphological classes within a single sample. Our approach allows for the analysis of nuclear shape with unprecedented precision and scale and will be widely applicable to different species and different areas of biology.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedOrganelle ShapeAlgorithmsAnimalsCell NucleusChromatinCytological TechniquesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysInfertility, MaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred CBAMice, Inbred DBAReproducibility of ResultsChromatinfertilityimage analysismorphometricsrodentsspermatogenesis

Identifiers

PMID30753283
PMCPMC6497523
OpenAlexW2952150922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.