Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019
Overall survival and updated progression-free survival outcomes in a randomized phase II study of combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized, Open, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Study of Fluzoparib in Combination With Apatinib Versus Investigator-Selected Chemotherapy for HRD-Positive/HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer
A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study of Fluorizoparib in Combination With Apatinib Versus Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HRD-positive, HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and tolerability of PARP inhibitors in cancer patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Angiogenesis Inhibitor-Based Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of Olaparib, Niraparib, Rucaparib therapies on Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Ovarian Cancer -Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of treatment regimens for recurrent advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Olaparib-associated toxicity in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Current computer-aided drug design · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors combined with poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors in the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of VEGFR inhibitors for recurrent ovarian cancer: a systematic review.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors combined with antiangiogenic agents in the maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta‑analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Pooled it
- The efficacy and toxicity of angiogenesis inhibitors for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Prognostic Factors for PARP Inhibitors in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Olaparib Combined With Cediranib in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- A phase 2 trial exploring the significance of homologous recombination status in patients with platinum sensitive or platinum resistant relapsed ovarian cancer receiving combination cediranib and olaparib.Gynecologic oncology · 2024Trial
- NCI10066: a Phase 1/2 study of olaparib in combination with ramucirumab in previously treated metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2024Trial
- Olaparib plus Durvalumab, with or without Bevacizumab, as Treatment in PARP Inhibitor-Naïve Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: A Phase II Multi-Cohort Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Trial
- Olaparib treatment for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer by BRCA mutation and homologous recombination deficiency status: Phase II LIGHT study primary analysis.Gynecologic oncology · 2022Trial
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an oral anti-angiogenic. In the primary analysis of this phase II study, combination cediranib/olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This updated analysis was conducted to characterize overall survival (OS) and update PFS outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsNinety patients were enrolled to this randomized, open-label, phase II study between October 2011 and June 2013 across nine United States-based academic centers. Data cut-off was 21 December 2016, with a median follow-up of 46 months. Participants had relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer of high-grade serous or endometrioid histology or had a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Participants were randomized to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily until disease progression.
resultsIn this updated analysis, median PFS remained significantly longer with cediranib/olaparib compared with olaparib alone (16.5 versus 8.2 months, hazard ratio 0.50; P = 0.007). Subset analyses within stratum defined by BRCA status demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PFS (23.7 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.002) and OS (37.8 versus 23.0 months, P = 0.047) in gBRCA wild-type/unknown patients, although OS was not statistically different in the overall study population (44.2 versus 33.3 months, hazard ratio 0.64; P = 0.11). PFS and OS appeared similar between the two arms in gBRCAm patients. The most common CTCAE grade 3/4 adverse events with cediranib/olaparib remained fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension.
conclusionsCombination cediranib/olaparib significantly extends PFS compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Subset analyses suggest this margin of benefit is driven by PFS prolongation in patients without gBRCAm. OS was also significantly increased by the cediranib/olaparib combination in this subset of patients. Additional studies of this combination are ongoing and should incorporate analyses based upon BRCA status.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT0111648.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.