Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753225›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

SLFN11 can sensitize tumor cells towards IFN-γ-mediated T cell killing.

Riccardo Mezzadra, Marjolein de Bruijn, Lucas T Jae, Raquel Gomez-Eerland, Anja Duursma, Ferenc A Scheeren, Thijn R Brummelkamp, Ton N Schumacher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Unleashing the potential of a low CpGFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Riccardo MezzadraDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7737-8461
Marjolein de BruijnDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lucas T JaeDivision of Biochemistry, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Raquel Gomez-EerlandDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anja DuursmaDivision of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ferenc A ScheerenDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-9023
Thijn R BrummelkampDivision of Biochemistry, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ton N SchumacherDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAustrian Academy of Sciences · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental and clinical observations have highlighted the role of cytotoxic T cells in human tumor control. However, the parameters that control tumor cell sensitivity to T cell attack remain incompletely understood. To identify modulators of tumor cell sensitivity to T cell effector mechanisms, we performed a whole genome haploid screen in HAP1 cells. Selection of tumor cells by exposure to tumor-specific T cells identified components of the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) receptor (IFNGR) signaling pathway, and tumor cell killing by cytotoxic T cells was shown to be in large part mediated by the pro-apoptotic effects of IFN-γ. Notably, we identified schlafen 11 (SLFN11), a known modulator of DNA damage toxicity, as a regulator of tumor cell sensitivity to T cell-secreted IFN-γ. SLFN11 does not influence IFNGR signaling, but couples IFNGR signaling to the induction of the DNA damage response (DDR) in a context dependent fashion. In line with this role of SLFN11, loss of SLFN11 can reduce IFN-γ mediated toxicity. Collectively, our data indicate that SLFN11 can couple IFN-γ exposure of tumor cells to DDR and cellular apoptosis. Future work should reveal the mechanistic basis for the link between IFNGR signaling and DNA damage response, and identify tumor cell types in which SLFN11 contributes to the anti-tumor activity of T cells.

Indexed as

Amino Acid Chloromethyl KetonesAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHumansInterferon-gammaNuclear ProteinsQuinolinesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicAmino Acid Chloromethyl KetonesAntineoplastic AgentsInterferon-gammaNuclear ProteinsQuinolinesquinoline-val-asp(OMe)-CH2-OPHRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Small InterferingSLFN11 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30753225
PMCPMC6372190
OpenAlexW2914484956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.