Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753180›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Feasibility of feeding Aedes aegypti mosquitoes on dengue virus-infected human volunteers for vector competence studies in Iquitos, Peru.

Kanya C Long, Juan Sulca, Isabel Bazan, Helvio Astete, Hugo L Jaba, Crystyan Siles, Claudine Kocher, Stalin Vilcarromero, Julia Schwarz, Karin S Escobedo-Vargas and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kanya C LongDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Juan SulcaVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Isabel BazanVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Helvio AsteteVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Hugo L JabaEntomology Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Crystyan SilesVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Claudine KocherVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Stalin VilcarromeroVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-9097-0638
Julia SchwarzIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Karin S Escobedo-VargasEntomology Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Fanny Castro-LlanosEntomology Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Leslye AnguloVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Guadalupe FloresVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Cesar Ramal-AsayagDepartment of Internal Medicine, Loreto Regional Hospital "Felipe Santiago Arriola Iglesias," Punchana, Iquitos, Peru.
Eric S HalseyVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Robert D HontzVirology and Emerging Infections Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6, Washington DC, Lima and Iquitos, Peru.
Valerie A Paz-SoldanGlobal Community Health and Behavioral Sciences Department, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
Thomas W ScottDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Louis LambrechtsInsect-Virus Interactions Group, Department of Genomes and Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Amy C MorrisonDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6224-5984
United States Naval Medical Research Unit SOUTH · PEUniversity of California, Davis · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USTulane University · USUniversidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana · PE

Funding

Surveillance Core (B)P01AI098670 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MORRISON, AMY CELESTE · 2014 to 2018
$7.9M
Measuring Entomological Risk for DengueR01AI069341 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCOTT, THOMAS WALLACE · 2006 to 2010
$2.3M
METHODS FOR MEASURING NATURAL DENGUE TRANSMISSION FROM HUMANS TO MOSQUITOESR03AI107446 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LAMBRECHTS, LOUIS, MORRISON, AMY CELESTE · 2013 to 2014
$126k
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI098670NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069341NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI107446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransmission of dengue virus (DENV) from humans to mosquitoes represents a critical component of dengue epidemiology. Examinations of this process have generally been hampered by a lack of methods that adequately represent natural acquisition of DENV by mosquitoes from humans. In this study, we assessed artificial and natural blood feeding methods based on rates of DENV infection and dissemination within mosquitoes for use in a field-based epidemiological cohort study in Iquitos, Peru. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsOur study was implemented, stepwise, between 2011 and 2015. Participants who were 5 years and older with 5 or fewer days of fever were enrolled from ongoing clinic- and neighborhood-based studies on dengue in Iquitos. Wild type, laboratory-reared Aedes aegypti were fed directly on febrile individuals or on blood collected from participants that was either untreated or treated with EDTA. Mosquitoes were tested after approximately 14 days of extrinsic incubation for DENV infection and dissemination. A total of 58 participants, with viremias ranging from 1.3 × 10(2) to 2.9 × 10(6) focus-forming units per mL of serum, participated in one or more feeding methods. DENV infection and dissemination rates were not significantly different following direct and indirect-EDTA feeding; however, they were significantly lower for mosquitoes that fed indirectly on blood with no additive. Relative to direct feeding, infection rates showed greater variation following indirect-EDTA than indirect-no additive feeding. Dissemination rates were similar across all feeding methods. No differences were detected in DENV infection or dissemination rates in mosquitoes fed directly on participants with different dengue illness severity. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using direct and indirect feeding methods for field-based studies on vector competence. Direct mosquito feeding is preferable in terms of logistical ease, biosecurity, and reliability.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAedesAgedAnimalsDengueDengue VirusFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInformed ConsentInsect Bites and StingsMiddle AgedMosquito VectorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30753180
PMCPMC6388938
OpenAlexW2913214959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.