Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30748121›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019

Effectiveness of NGO-government partnership to prevent and treat child wasting in urban India.

Sheila Chanani, Anagha Waingankar, Neena Shah More, Shanti Pantvaidya, Armida Fernandez, Anuja Jayaraman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health systems and nutrition in the time of COVID-19.Journal of social and economic development · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheila ChananiSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8518-3114
Anagha WaingankarSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0790-876X
Neena Shah MoreSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4365-0789
Shanti PantvaidyaSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6529-9726
Armida FernandezSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3162-8170
Anuja JayaramanSociety for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-2099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviews the performance of a community-based nutrition programme in preventing and treating wasting without complications among children under age three in urban informal settlements of India. Implemented by a non-profit organization, with national (Integrated Child Development Services [ICDS]) and city-level (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai [MCGM]) government partners, the programme screened 7,759 children between May 2014 and April 2015. During this period, the programme admitted 705 moderately wasted and 189 severely wasted children into the treatment group and 6,820 not wasted children into the prevention group. Both prevention and treatment groups received growth monitoring, referrals to public health facilities, and home-based counselling (if <6 months) by community health workers. Treatment groups received additional home-based counselling and access to medical screenings. Severely wasted children also received access to ready-to-use therapeutic food. The study assessed default rates, wasting status, and average weight gain 3 months after admission. Factors associated with growth faltering in the prevention group were explored using logistic regression. Default rates for the severely wasted, moderately wasted, and prevention group were 12.7%, 20.4%, and 22.1%, respectively. Recovery rate was 42.4% for the severely wasted and 61.3% for the moderately wasted. For the moderately wasted, mean weight gain was 2.1 g/kg/day, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.6, 2.6], and 4.5 g/kg/day for the severely wasted, 95% CI [3.1, 5.9]. Among prevention group children, 3.6% faltered into wasting-3.2% into moderate and 0.4% into severe. The paper gives insights into ways in which ICDS and MCGM can successfully integrate large-scale community-based acute malnutrition programming.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesGovernmentChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolCommunity Health WorkersCounselingHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornLocal GovernmentNutritional StatusNutrition TherapyOrganizations, NonprofitProgram EvaluationPublic-Private Sector Partnerships

Identifiers

PMID30748121
PMCPMC7198940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.