Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30748011›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2019

Assessment and management of bone health in women with early breast cancer receiving endocrine treatment in the DATA study.

Irene E G van Hellemond, Carolien H Smorenburg, Petronella G M Peer, Astrid C P Swinkels, Caroline M Seynaeve, Maurice J C van der Sangen, Judith R Kroep, Hiltje de Graaf, Aafke H Honkoop, Frans L G Erdkamp and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Irene E G van HellemondDepartment of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6775-7364
Carolien H SmorenburgDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Petronella G M PeerBiostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Astrid C P SwinkelsClinical research department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation IKNL, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Caroline M SeynaeveDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Maurice J C van der SangenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Judith R KroepDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hiltje de GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Aafke H HonkoopDepartment of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Frans L G ErdkampDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Franchette W P J van den BerkmortelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Maaike de BoerDepartment of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Wilfred K de RoosDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands.
Sabine C LinnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexander L T ImholzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands.
Vivianne C G Tjan-HeijnenDepartment of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG)
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLIsala · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMedisch Centrum Alkmaar · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phase III DATA study investigates the efficacy of adjuvant anastrozole (6 vs. 3 year) in postmenopausal women with breast cancer previously treated with 2-3 years of tamoxifen. This planned side-study assessed patterns of care regarding detection and treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis, and trends in bone mineral density (BMD) during and after therapy. We registered all BMD measurements and bisphosphonate-use. Time to osteopenia/osteoporosis was analysed by Kaplan Meier methodology. For the trend in T-scores we used linear mixed models with random patients effects. Of 1860 eligible DATA patients, 910 (48.9%) had a baseline BMD measurement. Among patients with a normal baseline BMD (n = 417), osteopenia was observed in 53.5% and 55.4% in the 6- and 3-year group respectively (p = 0.18), during follow-up. Only two patients (3-year group) developed osteoporosis. Of the patients with osteopenia at baseline (n = 408), 24.4% and 20.4% developed osteoporosis respectively (p = 0.89). Three years after randomisation 18.3% and 18.2% used bisphosphonates in the 6- and 3-year groups respectively and 6 years after randomisation this was 23.7% and 20.9% respectively (p = 0.90) of which the majority used oral bisphosphonates. The yearly mean BMD-change during anastrozole in the lumbar spine showed a T-score decline of 0.075. After bisphosphonate addition the decline became less prominent (0.047 (p < 0.001)) and after anastrozole cessation, while continuing bisphosphonates, the mean BMD yearly increased (0.047 (p < 0.001)). In conclusion, extended anastrozole therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of osteoporosis. Anastrozole-use was associated with a BMD decrease; however, the decline was modest and partially reversible after anastrozole cessation.

Indexed as

AnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBone DensityBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalProspective StudiesTamoxifenAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifenadjuvantanastrozolearomatase inhibitorsbone healthbone mineral densitybreast cancerendocrine therapyosteopeniaosteoporosistamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID30748011
PMCPMC6767695
OpenAlexW2912672921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.