Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30747908›Full record

Trial reportPain2019

SUMMIT-07: a randomized trial of NKTR-181, a new molecular entity, full mu-opioid receptor agonist for chronic low-back pain.

John Markman, Jeffrey Gudin, Richard Rauck, Charles Argoff, Michael Rowbotham, Eva Agaiby, Joseph Gimbel, Nathaniel Katz, Stephen K Doberstein, Mary Tagliaferri and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02362672 (A Phase 3 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of NKTR-181 in Opioid-Naive Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02362672 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of NKTR-181 in Opioid-Naive Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorNektar TherapeuticsRan2015 to 2017Enrolled1,189ConditionsLow Back Pain, Chronic PainArmsNKTR-181 BID tablets, Placebo to match NKTR-181 BID tablets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of treatment duration on the effectiveness of opioid analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the analgesic efficacy, safety and tolerability of VPX638 administered topically to painful wounds.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. French-Canadian Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale: The COWS-FC.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

John MarkmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Translational Pain Research Program, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States.
Jeffrey GudinPain Management and Palliative Care Center, Englewood Hospital and Medical Center, Englewood, NJ, United States.
Richard RauckCarolinas Pain Institute, The Center for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Charles ArgoffDepartment of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, United States.
Michael RowbothamSutter Health, CPMC Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Eva AgaibyClinical Investigation Specialists Inc, Kenosha, WI, United States.
Joseph GimbelArizona Research Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Nathaniel KatzTufts University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Boston, MA, United States.
Stephen K DobersteinNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Mary TagliaferriNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Lin LuNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Suresh SiddhantiNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Martin HaleGold Coast Research, LLC, Plantation, FL, United States.
Apple (Israel) · ILNektar Therapeutics (United States) · USAlbany Medical Center Hospital · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USClinical Investigation Specialists · USEnglewood Hospital and Medical Center · USSutter Health · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NKTR-181, a new molecular entity, mu-opioid receptor agonist with an inherently slow rate of central nervous system (CNS) entry, was designed to provide analgesia while reducing abuse potential. This phase 3, enriched-enrollment, randomized-withdrawal trial evaluated the analgesic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of NKTR-181 in patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). Adults with moderate-to-severe CLBP refractory to nonopioid analgesics achieving an analgesic NKTR-181 dosage (100-400 mg twice daily) during the open-label titration period were randomized to continued NKTR-181 treatment, double-blind, or switched to placebo. The study was conducted at 55 sites in the United States. Of 1189 patients exposed to NKTR-181 during the titration period, 610 were randomized to NKTR-181 100 to 400 mg every 12 hours or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in weekly pain score (scale, 0-10) at 12 weeks from randomization baseline. Secondary outcome measures included responder rates defined by ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in pain score from screening to 12 weeks. Among 610 randomized patients, the mean pain score decreased from 6.73 to 2.32 during open-label titration. After randomization, the least-squares mean change in pain score was +0.92 for NKTR-181 vs +1.46 for placebo (P = 0.002). The ≥30%-improvement responder rate of NKTR-181 vs placebo was 71.2% vs 57.1% (P < 0.001), and the ≥50%-improvement responder rate was 51.1% vs 37.9% (P = 0.001). NKTR-181 was well tolerated with a low incidence (<3%) of CNS-related adverse events during the randomized treatment phase. In patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP, NKTR-181 demonstrated significant analgesic efficacy and a favorable safety/tolerability profile, with a low incidence of CNS adverse events.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedMorphinansPain ManagementPain MeasurementReceptors, OpioidAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidMorphinansNKTR-181Receptors, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID30747908
PMCPMC6553961
OpenAlexW2913094741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.