Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30747773›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2019

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Sepsis: A Phase 1b Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Dose Study of Antiprogrammed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Antibody (BMS-936559).

Richard S Hotchkiss, Elizabeth Colston, Sachin Yende, Derek C Angus, Lyle L Moldawer, Elliott D Crouser, Greg S Martin, Craig M Coopersmith, Scott Brakenridge, Florian B Mayr and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
21.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in sepsis: drivers of persistent immunosuppression and targets for precision immunotherapy.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Immunology of Sepsis.Clinics in chest medicine · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Richard S HotchkissDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Elizabeth ColstonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Innovative Medicines Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Sachin YendeVeterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Derek C AngusThe CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lyle L MoldawerDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Elliott D CrouserDepartment of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Greg S MartinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Craig M CoopersmithDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Scott BrakenridgeDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Florian B MayrVeterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Pauline K ParkDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
June YeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Innovative Medicines Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Ian M CatlettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Innovative Medicines Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Ihab G GirgisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Innovative Medicines Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Dennis M GraselaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Innovative Medicines Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
University of Pittsburgh · USFlorida College · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Enhancing Innate and Adaptive Immunity to Improve Sepsis SurvivalR35GM126928 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Richard Samuel Hotchkiss · 2018 to 2026
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess for the first time the safety and pharmacokinetics of an antiprogrammed cell death-ligand 1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (BMS-936559; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) and its effect on immune biomarkers in participants with sepsis-associated immunosuppression.

designRandomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation.

settingSeven U.S. hospital ICUs. STUDY POPULATION: Twenty-four participants with sepsis, organ dysfunction (hypotension, acute respiratory failure, and/or acute renal injury), and absolute lymphocyte count less than or equal to 1,100 cells/μL.

interventionsParticipants received single-dose BMS-936559 (10-900 mg; n = 20) or placebo (n = 4) infusions. Primary endpoints were death and adverse events; key secondary endpoints included receptor occupancy and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR levels. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe treated group was older (median 62 yr treated pooled vs 46 yr placebo), and a greater percentage had more than 2 organ dysfunctions (55% treated pooled vs 25% placebo); other baseline characteristics were comparable. Overall mortality was 25% (10 mg dose: 2/4; 30 mg: 2/4; 100 mg: 1/4; 300 mg: 1/4; 900 mg: 0/4; placebo: 0/4). All participants had adverse events (75% grade 1-2). Seventeen percent had a serious adverse event (3/20 treated pooled, 1/4 placebo), with none deemed drug-related. Adverse events that were potentially immune-related occurred in 54% of participants; most were grade 1-2, none required corticosteroids, and none were deemed drug-related. No significant changes in cytokine levels were observed. Full receptor occupancy was achieved for 28 days after BMS-936559 (900 mg). At the two highest doses, an apparent increase in monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR expression (> 5,000 monoclonal antibodies/cell) was observed and persisted beyond 28 days.

conclusionsIn this first clinical evaluation of programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 pathway inhibition in sepsis, BMS-936559 was well tolerated, with no evidence of drug-induced hypercytokinemia or cytokine storm, and at higher doses, some indication of restored immune status over 28 days. Further randomized trials on programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 pathway inhibition are needed to evaluate its clinical safety and efficacy in patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCytokinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSepsisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBMS-936559CytokinesImmunologic FactorsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID30747773
PMCPMC7254685
OpenAlexW2914455493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.