ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2020
Use of Concentrated Parenteral Nutrition Solutions Is Associated With Improved Nutrient Intakes and Postnatal Growth in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants.
Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of a Triple-chamber Bag Parenteral Nutrition in Children Ages up to 24 Months: An Observational Study.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2019Trial
- Medication errors involving parenteral nutrition preparations and concentrated electrolytes in a pediatric hospital: A qualitative analysis.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2026Article
- Length of Nutritional Transition Associates Negatively with Postnatal Growth in Very Low Birthweight Infants.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Cost-Consequences Analysis of Increased Utilization of Triple-Chamber-Bag Parenteral Nutrition in Preterm Neonates in Seven European Countries.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Erythrocyte transfusions increased the risk of elevated serum ferritin in very low birthweight infants and were associated with altered longitudinal growth.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence showing the beneficial effects of enhanced parenteral nutrition (PN) to very low-birth-weight (VLBW, <1500 g) infants is accumulating. However, PN composition and its impact on growth outcomes are questioned. This study aimed to investigate the associations between administration of a concentrated PN regime and intakes of energy and macronutrients as well as postnatal growth in VLBW infants.
methodsWe compared 2 cohorts of VLBW infants born before (n = 74) and after (n = 44) a concentrated PN regime was introduced into clinical use. Daily nutrition and fluid intake during the first 28 postnatal days and all available growth measurements during hospitalization were retrospectively collected from clinical charts.
resultsInfants who received concentrated PN compared with original PN had higher parenteral intakes of energy (56 vs 45 kcal/kg/d, P < 0.001), protein (2.6 vs 2.2 g/kg/d, P = 0.008), and fat (1.5 vs 0.7 g/kg/d, P < 0.001) during the first postnatal week. Changes in standard deviation scores for weight and length from birth to postnatal day 28 were more positive in the concentrated PN group (mean [95% CI]; weight change: -0.77 [-1.02 to -0.52] vs -1.29 [-1.33 to -1.05], P = 0.005; length change: -1.01 [-1.36 to -0.65] vs -1.60 [-1.95 to -1.25], P = 0.025). There were no significant differences in fluid intake and infant morbidity between the groups.
conclusionOur results suggest that concentrated PN is useful and seems to be safe for improving early nutrition and growth in VLBW infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.