Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30747394›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2019

Evaluating Community-Based Translational Interventions Using Historical Controls: Propensity Score vs. Disease Risk Score Approach.

Luohua Jiang, Shuai Chen, Janette Beals, Juned Siddique, Richard F Hamman, Ann Bullock, Spero M Manson, Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention Demonstration Project, Grant programs participating in the Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention Program are as follows: Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Cherokee Nation, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, the Chickasaw Nation, Coeur d’Alene Tribe, Colorado River Indian Tribes, Colville Confederated Tribes, Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe, Klamath Tribes, and Coquille Tribe, Fond du Lac Reservation, Gila River Health Care, Haskell Health Center, Ho-Chunk Nation, Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Indian Health Center of Santa Clara Valley, Native American Rehabilitation Association of the NW, Hunter Health, Kenaitze Indian Tribe IRA, Lawton IHS Service Unit, Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Norton Sound Health Corporation, Pine Ridge IHS Service Unit, Pueblo of San Felipe, Quinault Indian Nation, Rapid City IHS Diabetes Program, Red Lake Comprehensive Health Services, Rocky Boy Health Board, Seneca Nation of Indians, Sonoma County Indian Health Project, South East Alaska Regional Health Consortium, Southcentral Foundation, Trenton Indian Service Area, Tuba City Regional Health Care Corporation, United American Indian Involvement, Inc., United Indian Health Services, Inc., Warm Springs Health & Wellness Center, Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, Zuni Pueblo.

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luohua JiangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697-7550, USA. lhjiang@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-7260
Shuai ChenDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Janette BealsCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Juned SiddiqueDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Richard F HammanDepartment of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, LEAD Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ann BullockDivision of Diabetes Treatment and Prevention, Indian Health Service, Rockville, MD, USA.
Spero M MansonCenters for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention Demonstration Project
Grant programs participating in the Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention Program are as follows: Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Cherokee Nation, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, the Chickasaw Nation, Coeur d’Alene Tribe, Colorado River Indian Tribes, Colville Confederated Tribes, Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe, Klamath Tribes, and Coquille Tribe, Fond du Lac Reservation, Gila River Health Care, Haskell Health Center, Ho-Chunk Nation, Indian Health Board of Minneapolis, Indian Health Center of Santa Clara Valley, Native American Rehabilitation Association of the NW, Hunter Health, Kenaitze Indian Tribe IRA, Lawton IHS Service Unit, Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, Norton Sound Health Corporation, Pine Ridge IHS Service Unit, Pueblo of San Felipe, Quinault Indian Nation, Rapid City IHS Diabetes Program, Red Lake Comprehensive Health Services, Rocky Boy Health Board, Seneca Nation of Indians, Sonoma County Indian Health Project, South East Alaska Regional Health Consortium, Southcentral Foundation, Trenton Indian Service Area, Tuba City Regional Health Care Corporation, United American Indian Involvement, Inc., United Indian Health Services, Inc., Warm Springs Health & Wellness Center, Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska, Zuni Pueblo.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH COREP30DK092923 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Angela Gwen Brega · 2011 to 2026
$10.2M
Comparative Effectiveness Evaluation of a Diabetes Case Management Intervention in AI/AN CommunitiesR21DK108187 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JIANG, LUOHUA · 2016 to 2017
$425k
NIDDK NIH HHS 1P30DK092923NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092923NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK108187NIDDK NIH HHS R21DK108187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many community-based translations of evidence-based interventions are designed as one-arm studies due to ethical and other considerations. Evaluating the impacts of such programs is challenging. Here, we examine the effectiveness of the lifestyle intervention implemented by the Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention (SDPI-DP) demonstration project, a translational lifestyle intervention among American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Data from the landmark Diabetes Prevention Program placebo group was used as a historical control. We compared the use of propensity score (PS) and disease risk score (DRS) matching to adjust for potential confounder imbalance between groups. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for diabetes risk was 0.35 for SDPI-DP lifestyle intervention vs. control. However, when relevant diabetes risk factors were considered, the adjusted HR estimates were attenuated toward 1, ranging from 0.56 (95% CI 0.44-0.71) to 0.69 (95% CI 0.56-0.96). The differences in estimated HRs using the PS and DRS approaches were relatively small but DRS matching resulted in more participants being matched and smaller standard errors of effect estimates. Carefully employed, publicly available randomized clinical trial data can be used as a historical control to evaluate the intervention effectiveness of one-arm community translational initiatives. It is critical to use a proper statistical method to balance the distributions of potential confounders between comparison groups in this kind of evaluations.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeComparative Effectiveness ResearchDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Life StyleAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRisk AssessmentComparative effectiveness evaluationDisease risk scoreHistorical controlsPrognostic scorePropensity scoreSingle-arm intervention

Identifiers

PMID30747394
PMCPMC6520136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.