Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30747250›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2019

Tumor-associated macrophages: a short compendium.

Hans Prenen, Massimiliano Mazzone

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy: from bench to bedside.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hans PrenenOncology Department, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium. hans.prenen@uza.be.
Massimiliano MazzoneLab of Tumor Inflammation and Angiogenesis, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. massimiliano.mazzone@kuleuven.vib.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-4015
Antwerp University Hospital · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BE

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 308459H2020 European Research Council OxyMO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages play an important role in tissue development and homeostasis. They serve as a nexus between adaptive and innate immunity, and employ considerable plasticity. In cancer, they play a pivotal role in chronic inflammation and tumor growth either by directly stimulating the proliferation of cancer cells or by producing angiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors. Although numerous immune cells play an important role in the tumor microenvironment, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are by far the most extensively studied. A better understanding of the role of TAMs in mediating chemo- and radiotherapy resistance and suppressing immunosurveillance has led to numerous strategies targeting TAMs as an anticancer therapy either by targeting them directly or by polarizing TAMs toward a tumoricidal phenotype.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansImmunity, InnateImmunologic SurveillanceInflammationMacrophagesNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicTumor MicroenvironmentCancerInnate and adaptive immunityMacrophageMonocytesTAM

Identifiers

PMID30747250
PMCPMC11105658
OpenAlexW2913417421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.