Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30747245›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2019

[Skin damage by tropospheric ozone].

K B Fuks, B Woodby, G Valacchi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cutaneous Redox Senescence.Biomedicines · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Blueberry Supplementation and Skin Health.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Aging in the sebaceous gland.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bench approaches to study the detrimental cutaneous impact of tropospheric ozone.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

K B FuksIUF - Leibniz-Institut für umweltmedizinische Forschung, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
B WoodbyPlant for Human Health Institute, NC Research Campus, North Carolina State University, 600 Laureate Way, 28081, Kannapolis, NC, USA.
G ValacchiPlant for Human Health Institute, NC Research Campus, North Carolina State University, 600 Laureate Way, 28081, Kannapolis, NC, USA. gvalacc@ncsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tropospheric (ground level) ozone (O

Indexed as

Air PollutionAir PollutantsHumansLipid PeroxidationNitrogen DioxideOxidative StressOzoneParticulate MatterPublic HealthSkin AgingUltraviolet RaysAir PollutantsNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterAir pollutionOxidative stressPeroxidationSkin agingSkin wrinkling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.