Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30747125›Full record

ArticleRevue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)2018

Proof of concept of mass dog vaccination for thecontrol and elimination of canine rabies.

S Cleaveland, S M Thumbi, M Sambo, A Lugelo, K Lushasi, K Hampson, F Lankester

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

S Cleaveland
S M Thumbi
M Sambo
A Lugelo
K Lushasi
K Hampson
F Lankester
Ifakara Health Institute · TZUniversity of Glasgow · GBWashington State University · USNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology · TZ

Funding

Wellcome Trust 082715Wellcome Trust 095787Wellcome Trust 110330Wellcome Trust 110330/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 207569Wellcome Trust 207569/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 100 years, canine rabies vaccination has been available as a tool for rabies control and elimination. However, domestic dogs still remain a major reservoir for rabies, and although canine rabies has been eliminated through mass dog vaccination in some parts of the world, the disease continues to kill tens of thousands of people every year in Africa and Asia. This review focuses on the situation on those two continents, presenting evidence to show that canine rabies elimination is both epidemiologically and operationally feasible, and could be achieved across a wide range of settings in Africa and Asia. The challenges of achieving the large-scale, comprehensive dog vaccination coverage that is required are discussed, and opportunities for developing new strategies that generate multiple benefits for human and animal health and welfare are highlighted. Finally, the substantial progress that has been made in developing the tools, partnerships and frameworks needed to move towards global canine rabies elimination is outlined.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsAsiaDisease EradicationDog DiseasesDogsHumansMass VaccinationOne HealthPopulation ControlRabiesRabies VaccinesZoonosesRabies VaccinesAfricaAsiaCanine rabiesDog rabiesDog vaccinationEliminationOne HealthRabies

Identifiers

PMID30747125
PMCPMC7612386
OpenAlexW2998639949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.