Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30747105›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Offline impact of transcranial focused ultrasound on cortical activation in primates.

Lennart Verhagen, Cécile Gallea, Davide Folloni, Charlotte Constans, Daria Ea Jensen, Harry Ahnine, Léa Roumazeilles, Mathieu Santin, Bashir Ahmed, Stéphane Lehericy and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07518927 (Mapping Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound), which is not on this map. Cited by 167 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07518927 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Mapping Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU)-Evoked Brain Network Responses Using Intracranial Electrophysiological Recordings

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2026 to 2031Enrolled30ConditionsLow Intensity Focussed Ultrasound, Electrodes, ImplantedArmsLow Intensity Focused Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lennart Verhagen *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3207-7929
Cécile Gallea *Institute du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Centre for NeuroImaging Research (CENIR), Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Davide FolloniWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1653-5969
Charlotte ConstansPhysics for Medicine Paris, Inserm, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL Research University, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6378-9158
Daria Ea JensenWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Harry AhnineInstitute du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Centre for NeuroImaging Research (CENIR), Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Léa RoumazeillesWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mathieu SantinInstitute du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Centre for NeuroImaging Research (CENIR), Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Bashir AhmedDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stéphane LehericyInstitute du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Centre for NeuroImaging Research (CENIR), Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Miriam C Klein-FlüggeWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5156-9833
Kristine KrugDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7119-9350
Rogier B MarsWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew Fs Rushworth *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Pierre Pouget *Institute du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), UMRS 975 INSERM, CNRS 7225, UMPC, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4721-7376
Jean-François Aubry *Physics for Medicine Paris, Inserm, ESPCI Paris, CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2644-3945
Jerome Sallet *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7878-0209

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H016902/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019814/1Medical Research Council G0600994Medical Research Council G0902373Medical Research Council MR/P024955/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand brain circuits it is necessary both to record and manipulate their activity. Transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation technique. To date, investigations report short-lived neuromodulatory effects, but to deliver on its full potential for research and therapy, ultrasound protocols are required that induce longer-lasting 'offline' changes. Here, we present a TUS protocol that modulates brain activation in macaques for more than one hour after 40 s of stimulation, while circumventing auditory confounds. Normally activity in brain areas reflects activity in interconnected regions but TUS caused stimulated areas to interact more selectively with the rest of the brain. In a within-subject design, we observe regionally specific TUS effects for two medial frontal brain regions - supplementary motor area and frontal polar cortex. Independently of these site-specific effects, TUS also induced signal changes in the meningeal compartment. TUS effects were temporary and not associated with microstructural changes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebral CortexMacacaMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographybrain stimulationconnectivityfrontal lobeneuroimagingneuroscienceresting-state fMRIrhesus macaquetranscranial ultrasound stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30747105
PMCPMC6372282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.