ArticlePhysiological reports2019
Variation in the repulsive guidance molecule family in human populations.
Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of RGMa: A New Frontier in Neurological Disorder Treatment.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- RGMb drives macrophage infiltration to aggravate kidney disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Variation in the repulsive guidance molecule family in human populations.Physiological reports · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Repulsive guidance molecules, RGMA, RGMB, and RGMC, are related proteins discovered independently through different experimental paradigms. They are encoded by single copy genes in mammalian and other vertebrate genomes, and are ~50% identical in amino acid sequence. The importance of RGM actions in human physiology has not been realized, as most research has focused on non-human models, although mutations in RGMC are the cause of the severe iron storage disorder, juvenile hemochromatosis. Here I show that repositories of human genomic and population genetic data can be used as starting points for discovery and for developing new testable hypotheses about each of these paralogs in human biology and disease susceptibility. Information was extracted, aggregated, and analyzed from the Ensembl and UCSC Genome Browsers, the Exome Aggregation Consortium, the Genotype-Tissue Expression project portal, the cBio portal for Cancer Genomics, and the National Cancer Institute Genomic Data Commons data site. Results identify extensive variation in gene expression patterns, substantial alternative RNA splicing, and possible missense alterations and other modifications in the coding regions of each of the three genes, with many putative mutations being detected in individuals with different types of cancers. Moreover, selected amino acid substitutions are highly prevalent in the world population, with minor allele frequencies of up to 37% for RGMA and up to 8% for RGMB. These results indicate that protein sequence variation is common in the human RGM family, and raises the possibility that individual variants will have a significant population impact on human physiology and/or disease predisposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.