Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30746793›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2019

Robust network-based regularization and variable selection for high-dimensional genomic data in cancer prognosis.

Jie Ren, Yinhao Du, Shaoyu Li, Shuangge Ma, Yu Jiang, Cen Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational Analysis of High-Dimensional DNA Methylation Data for Cancer Prognosis.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prognostic Value ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jie RenDepartment of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
Yinhao DuDepartment of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
Shaoyu LiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-9001-4999
Yu JiangDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Cen WuDepartment of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.ORCID 0000-0002-5172-141X

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale SPORE in Lung Cancer (YSILC): The Biology and Personalized Treatment of Lung CancerP50CA196530 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2015 to 2026
$31.1M
Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
Penalization methods for identifying gene envrionment interactions and applications to melanoma and other cancer typesR21CA191383 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2015 to 2017
$435k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS CA191383NCI NIH HHS CA204120NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196530NCI NIH HHS P50CA196530NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120NCI NIH HHS R21 CA191383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer genomic studies, an important objective is to identify prognostic markers associated with patients' survival. Network-based regularization has achieved success in variable selections for high-dimensional cancer genomic data, because of its ability to incorporate the correlations among genomic features. However, as survival time data usually follow skewed distributions, and are contaminated by outliers, network-constrained regularization that does not take the robustness into account leads to false identifications of network structure and biased estimation of patients' survival. In this study, we develop a novel robust network-based variable selection method under the accelerated failure time model. Extensive simulation studies show the advantage of the proposed method over the alternative methods. Two case studies of lung cancer datasets with high-dimensional gene expression measurements demonstrate that the proposed approach has identified markers with important implications.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanHumansLung NeoplasmsModels, GeneticPrognosishigh-dimensional datalung cancer prognosisnetwork-based regularizationpenalized estimationrobust variable selection

Identifiers

PMID30746793
PMCPMC6446588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.