Editorial: simplifying screening for primary liver cancer - do the LCR1 and LCR2 tests hold the key?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. Diagnostic Value of Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography Combined with Serum AFP, TSGF, and GP73 Assay in the Diagnosis of Primary Liver Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Editorial: simplifying screening for primary liver cancer - do the LCR1 and LCR2 tests hold the key? Authors' reply.2019
• Comment on
  LCR1 and LCR2, two multi-analyte blood tests to assess liver cancer risk in patients without or with cirrhosis.2019

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as