Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30746640›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2019

Spike-Related Electrophysiological Identification of Cultured Hippocampal Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons.

Cosimo Prestigio, Daniele Ferrante, Pierluigi Valente, Silvia Casagrande, Ennio Albanesi, Yuchio Yanagawa, Fabio Benfenati, Pietro Baldelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Effect of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on excitability of glutaminergic neurons and gamma-aminobutyric neurons in mouse hippocampus].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adam, amigo, brain, and K channel.Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. PRRT2 modulates presynaptic CaCell reports · 2021
    Article
  14. An interaction between PRRT2 and NaCell death & disease · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Presynaptic L-Type CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cosimo PrestigioCenter for Synaptic Neuroscience and Technology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Daniele FerranteDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Pierluigi ValenteDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia CasagrandeDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Ennio AlbanesiDepartment of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Yuchio YanagawaDepartment of Genetic and Behavioral Neuroscience, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.
Fabio BenfenatiCenter for Synaptic Neuroscience and Technology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Pietro BaldelliDepartment of Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy. pietro.baldelli@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9599-3436

Funding

Compagnia di San Paolo 20612Compagnia di San Paolo 9344Ministero della Salute (IT) GR-2016-02363972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultured hippocampal neurons represent the most widely used experimental substrate for in vitro electrophysiological studies. Nevertheless, in most cases, the nature of neuron under study is not identified as excitatory or inhibitory, or even worse, recorded neurons are considered as excitatory because of the paucity of GABAergic interneurons. Thus, the definition of reliable criteria able to guarantee an unequivocal identification of excitatory and inhibitory cultured hippocampal neurons is an unmet need. To reach this goal, we compared the electrophysiological properties and the localization and size of the axon initial segment (AIS) of cultured hippocampal neurons, taking advantage from GAD67-GFP knock-in mice, which expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-containing cells, allowed to unambiguously determine the precise nature of the neuron under study. Our results demonstrate that the passive electrophysiological properties, the localization and size of the AIS, and the shape and frequency of the action potential (AP) are not reliable to unequivocally identify neurons as excitatory or inhibitory. The only parameter, related to the shape of the single AP, showing minimal overlap between the sample-point distributions of the two neuronal subpopulations, was the AP half-width. However, the estimation of the AP failure ratio evoked by a short train of high-current steps applied at increasing frequency (40-140 Hz) resulted to be indisputably the safer and faster way to identify the excitatory or inhibitory nature of an unknown neuron. Our findings provide a precise framework for further electrophysiological investigations of in vitro hippocampal neurons.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAxonsCells, CulturedFemaleGlutamate DecarboxylaseGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHippocampusKineticsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLNeural InhibitionNeuronsGlutamate DecarboxylaseGreen Fluorescent ProteinsAction potentialAxonal initial segmentExcitatory neuronsFiring frequencyHalf-widthInhibitory neurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.