Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30746626›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated sediments by persulfate oxidation and determination of degradation product cytotoxicity based on HepG2 and ZF4 cell lines.

Cheng-Di Dong, Mei-Ling Tsai, Tsing-Hai Wang, Jih-Hsing Chang, Chiu-Wen Chen, Chang-Mao Hung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Water pollution prevention and state of the art treatment technologies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Di DongDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Mei-Ling TsaiDepartment of Seafood Science, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Tsing-Hai WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Yuan Ze University, Zhongli, Taiwan.
Jih-Hsing ChangDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Chiu-Wen ChenDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. cwchen@nkust.edu.tw.
Chang-Mao HungDepartment of Marine Environmental Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. hungcm1031@gmail.com.
National Kaohsiung University of Science and TechnologyChaoyang University of Technology · TWNational Kaohsiung Marine University · TWYuan Ze University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the use of magnetite (Fe

Indexed as

Cell LineGeologic SedimentsHumansOxidation-ReductionPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWater Pollutants, ChemicalCarbon blackCytotoxicityHepG2 cellsMagnetiteMTT assayPersulfatePolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsZF4 cells

Identifiers

PMID30746626
OpenAlexW2913178197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.