ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2019
Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps: Recent Developments.
Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Classifying Colorectal Neoplasia Based on the NICE Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Highly-selective optical filter for NADH fluorescence detection in multiphoton microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic serrated lesions.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Incomplete resection rates of 4- to 20-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps when using wide-field cold snare resection with routine submucosal injection.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Development of artificial intelligence technology in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Review
- Uptake and barriers for implementation of the resect and discard strategy: an international survey.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in colon polyps detection.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2020Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Detection and Differentiation of Colon Polyps: A Technical Review for Physicians.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Artificial intelligence for identification and characterization of colonic polyps.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewOptical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps has been recently proposed as an alternative to histopathologic diagnosis. Recent developments in imaging techniques, new classification systems, and the use of artificial intelligence have allowed for increased viability of optical diagnosis. This review provides an up-to-date overview of optical diagnosis recommendations, classifications, outcomes, and recent developments. RECENT
findingsThere are currently seven major classification systems and three major society recommendations for quality benchmarks for optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps. The NICE classification has been extensively studied and meets quality benchmarks for most imaging techniques but does not allow for the diagnosis of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs). The SIMPLE classification has met quality benchmarks for NBI and i-Scan and allows for the diagnosis of SSPs. Other classification systems need to be further studied to validate effectiveness. Computer-assisted diagnosis of colorectal polyps is a very promising recent development with first studies showing that society-recommended quality benchmarks for real-time colonoscopies on patients are being met. Limitations include a non-negligible percentage of failure to diagnose, low specificity, and low number of real-time diagnostic studies. More research needs to be performed to further understand the value of artificial intelligence for optical polyp diagnosis. Optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps is currently a viable strategy for experienced endoscopists using validated classifications and imaging-enhanced endoscopy. Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis could make optical diagnosis widely applicable but is currently in its early developmental stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.