Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30746442›Full record

ArticleScience advances2019

Universal scaling across biochemical networks on Earth.

Hyunju Kim, Harrison B Smith, Cole Mathis, Jason Raymond, Sara I Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What makes a reaction network "chemical"?Journal of cheminformatics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Scaling laws in enzyme function reveal a new kind of biochemical universality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prebiotic Reaction Networks in Water.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Spontaneous formation of autocatalytic sets with self-replicating inorganic metal oxide clusters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyunju KimBeyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0768-4017
Harrison B SmithSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8806-9659
Cole MathisBeyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-9169
Jason RaymondSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6277-8059
Sara I WalkerBeyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5779-2772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of network science to biology has advanced our understanding of the metabolism of individual organisms and the organization of ecosystems but has scarcely been applied to life at a planetary scale. To characterize planetary-scale biochemistry, we constructed biochemical networks using a global database of 28,146 annotated genomes and metagenomes and 8658 cataloged biochemical reactions. We uncover scaling laws governing biochemical diversity and network structure shared across levels of organization from individuals to ecosystems, to the biosphere as a whole. Comparing real biochemical reaction networks to random reaction networks reveals that the observed biological scaling is not a product of chemistry alone but instead emerges due to the particular structure of selected reactions commonly participating in living processes. We show that the topology of biochemical networks for the three domains of life is quantitatively distinguishable, with >80% accuracy in predicting evolutionary domain based on biochemical network size and average topology. Together, our results point to a deeper level of organization in biochemical networks than what has been understood so far.

Indexed as

Biochemical PhenomenaGenomeArchaeaBacteriaBiological EvolutionCatalysisCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyEarth, PlanetEcosystemEnzymesMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetagenomeRandom AllocationEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID30746442
PMCPMC6357746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.