Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30746418›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2019

Telemedicine vs Office Visits in a Movement Disorders Clinic: Comparative Satisfaction of Physicians and Patients.

Ryan E Hanson, Marisa Truesdell, Glenn T Stebbins, Allison L Weathers, Christopher G Goetz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Televisits for Parkinson's disease: benefits and barriers.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Development of the Digital Inclusion Questionnaire (DIQUEST) in Parkinson's Disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  5. A Comparison of Patients' and Neurologists' Assessments of their Teleneurology Encounter: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Telehealth for Assessing and Managing Tardive Dyskinesia: Expert Insights from a Cross-Disciplinary Virtual Treatment Panel.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Patients' Postjudice of Tele-Neurology for Movement Disorders.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2022
    Article
  13. Provider Experience with Teleneurology in an Academic Neurology Department.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan E HansonRush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States.
Marisa TruesdellRush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States.
Glenn T StebbinsRush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States.
Allison L WeathersCleveland Clinic Cleveland OH United States.
Christopher G GoetzRush University Medical Center Chicago IL United States.
Rush University Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare patient and physician satisfaction between home-based telemedicine visits and office visits for follow-up care within a movement disorders program.

methodsPatients were offered telemedicine visits as follow-up care. After telemedicine visits, a questionnaire of items along a 10-point Likert Scale (10 = most satisfied) assessed patient and overall physician satisfaction, comparing the experience to past in-office visits.

resultsPatients and physicians were highly satisfied with the telemedicine experience, both groups having median endorsement scores of 9.25 and 10.0, respectively (response range 6-10), and furthermore, favoring future telemedicine visits when feasible. Although some assessments could not be performed (postural stability, rigidity), physicians likewise favored having future telemedicine visits (median score 10, range 5.0-10).

conclusionsThis direct comparison of patient satisfaction with telemedicine visits to previously experienced office visits strongly supports telemedicine care, with patients highlighting convenience, time, and expense. Despite some limitations with telemedicine, physicians expressed highly rated quality-of-service provided.

Indexed as

movement disordersoutcomes researchsatisfactiontelemedicineteleneurology

Identifiers

PMID30746418
PMCPMC6335514
OpenAlexW2899389701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.