ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2019
Adaptive Bayesian label fusion using kernel-based similarity metrics in hippocampus segmentation.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Entropy-Based Estimation of Event-Related De/Synchronization in Motor Imagery Using Vector-Quantized Patterns.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effectiveness of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a useful evaluation tool strongly depends on the performed segmentation of associated tissues or anatomical structures. We introduce an enhanced brain segmentation approach of Bayesian label fusion that includes the construction of adaptive target-specific probabilistic priors using atlases ranked by kernel-based similarity metrics to deal with the anatomical variability of collected MRI data. In particular, the developed segmentation approach appraises patch-based voxel representation to enhance the voxel embedding in spaces with increased tissue discrimination, as well as the construction of a neighborhood-dependent model that addresses the label assignment of each region with a different patch complexity. To measure the similarity between the target and training atlases, we propose a tensor-based kernel metric that also includes the training labeling set. We evaluate the proposed approach, adaptive Bayesian label fusion using kernel-based similarity metrics, in the specific case of hippocampus segmentation of five benchmark MRI collections, including ADNI dataset, resulting in an increased performance (assessed through the Dice index) as compared to other recent works.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.