ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
Outcomes of minimally invasive sleeve resection.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Sleeve Lobectomy for Centrally Located Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Complex Thoracic Resections in the Minimally Invasive Era: Is Open Surgery Becoming a Lost Skill?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Sleeve resection with or without parenchymal resection for proximal bronchial carcinoids: a retrospective analysis of recurrence and lymph node involvement.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Complex uniportal robotic-assisted sleeve resections under spontaneous ventilation and with double lumen intubation: a case series and a narrative review of the literature.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Technical Innovations and Complex Cases in Robotic Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Techniques of double-sleeve lobectomy for lung cancer: a narrative review of clinical practice.Journal of visualized surgery · 2025Review
- Outcomes following minimally invasive approachesTranslational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with or without enhanced recovery after surgery: a single institution, prospective randomized controlled study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Real-world surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stages IA-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicentric observational study involving 11,958 patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Observational
- Bronchoplasty for pulmonary preservation: A novel technique.JTCVS techniques · 2023Article
- Hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy: an elegant minimally invasive technique for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Review
- Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic left pneumonectomy: Retrospective analysis of eighteen consecutive patients from a single center.Thoracic cancer · 2021Article
- Robotic-assisted tracheobronchial surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Clinical guidelines on perioperative management strategies for enhanced recovery after lung surgery.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Review
- Robotic sleeve lobectomy-technically possible but is it being overused?Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- A plea for conservatism: minimally invasive sleeve resections.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Minimally invasive bronchial and bronchovascular sleeve resections.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Multiport and uniportal VATS sleeve resections.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleeve resection allows for preservation of lung parenchyma and improved long-term outcomes when compared with pneumonectomy. Little is known about minimally invasive sleeve resection, especially indications, feasibility, technical aspects, complications, and outcomes. We reviewed our institutional experience with sleeve resections via a minimally invasive approach.
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from 01/01/2010 to 11/01/2017. Indications, operative details, pathology, postoperative complications were reviewed and longer-term follow-up was reviewed.
resultsFifteen patients were identified (5 males, 10 females). Details are presented in
conclusionsIn experienced centers, sleeve resection via a minimally invasive approach is feasible with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Results in this small series appear comparable with the open approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.