Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30745945›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2019

Measurement of Health and Social Behaviors in Schoolchildren: Randomized Study Comparing Paper Versus Electronic Mode.

Kastytis Šmigelskas, Justė Lukoševičiūtė, Tomas Vaičiūnas, Kristina Mozūraitytė, Urtė Ivanavičiūtė, Ieva Milevičiūtė, Monika Žemaitaitytė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Motivation behind running among older adult runners.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Do Years of Running Experience Influence the Motivations of Amateur Marathon Athletes?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kastytis ŠmigelskasDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilžės g. 18, Kaunas LT-47181, Lithuania.
Justė LukoševičiūtėHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilžės g. 18, Kaunas LT-47181, Lithuania.
Tomas VaičiūnasDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilžės g. 18, Kaunas LT-47181, Lithuania.
Kristina MozūraitytėDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilžės g. 18, Kaunas LT-47181, Lithuania.
Urtė IvanavičiūtėDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilžės g. 18, Kaunas LT-47181, Lithuania.
Ieva MilevičiūtėDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilžės g. 18, Kaunas LT-47181, Lithuania.
Monika ŽemaitaitytėDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilžės g. 18, Kaunas LT-47181, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic survey mode has become a more common tool of research than it used to be previously. This is strongly associated with the overall digitization of modern society. However, the evidence on the possible mode effect on study results has been scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the comparability of findings on health and behaviours using a paper-versus-electronic mode of survey with randomization design among schoolchildren.

methodsA randomized study was conducted using a mandatory questionnaire on international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study in Lithuania, enrolling 531 schoolchildren aged 11-15 years. The questionnaire included health and social topics about physical activity, risk behaviours, self-reported health and symptoms, life satisfaction, bullying, fighting, family and school environment, peer relationships, electronic media communication, sociodemographic indicators, etc. The schoolchildren within classes were randomly selected for electronic or paper mode.

resultsIt was found that by study mode differences are inconsistent and in the majority of cases do not exceed 5%-point difference between the modes. The only significant difference was that in the paper survey the participants reported more exercise than in the electronic survey (OR=8.08, P<.001). Other trends were nonsignificant and did not show a consistent pattern - in certain behaviours the paper mode was related to healthier choices, while in others - the electronic.

conclusionsThe use of electronic questionnaires in surveys of schoolchildren may provide findings that are comparable with concurrent or previously conducted paper surveys.

Indexed as

health behaviorLithuaniaprevalencequestionnaire designreliabilityschool-aged childrensocial supportvalidity

Identifiers

PMID30745945
PMCPMC6368674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.