ArticleJournal of cytology
Usefulness of Cytological Scoring Method by Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology on Breast Duct Dilatation and Cystic Lesions.
Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe objective of this study was to apply a scoring method to fine needle aspiration cytology on breast duct dilatation and cystic lesions, to set an optimum cut-off value to differentiate between benign and malignant cases, and to identify features useful for cell judgment. MATERIALS AND
methodsSamples were 23 preparations of specimens (12 benign and 11 malignant cases) suspected with intraductal lesions or cystic change by ultrasonography or mammography and cytology. The scoring system comprised the following 10 items, and each item was scored 1-3, with a total score of 10-30. Three items were concerning structural atypia: 1, scattered epithelial cells; 2, uneven irregular cluster edge; and 3, overlapping nuclei of epithelial cells, and seven items were concerning cellular atypia: 4, irregular nuclear size; 5, irregular nuclear morphology; 6, deep dyeing chromatin; 7, chromatin granularity; 8, chromatin distribution; 9, nucleolus; and 10, absence of myoepithelial cells.
results(1) Scoring cut-off value: malignancy is to be suspected when the score is 20.75 or higher (diagnostic accuracy: 95.7%). (2) Findings useful for cancer judgment: the sensitivity of the following four findings was high: uneven irregular cluster edge, irregular nuclear overlapping, chromatin granularity, and absence of myoepithelial cells. (3) Correlation among the findings: the findings correlated with malignancy were as follows: scattered epithelial cells versus uneven irregular cluster edge (rs = 0.8).
conclusionCytological evaluation by scoring lesions accompanied by intraductal dilatation and cystic change was a useful method capable of differentiating between benign and malignant cases at a high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.