Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30745610›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2019

Cancer relapse in surgical patients who received perioperative transfusion of blood and blood products: A case-control study.

R Subha, Kurian Cherian, Archana Nair, Rachel Cherian Koshy, Jagathnath Krishna

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent advances in perioperative blood management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R SubhaDivision of Anaesthesiology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Kurian CherianDivision of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Archana NairDivision of Anaesthesiology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Rachel Cherian KoshyDivision of Anaesthesiology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Jagathnath KrishnaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Regional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsImmunomodulatory consequences of allogeneic blood transfusion may outweigh the advantages of improved oxygen delivery and tissue perfusion, especially in patients with cancer. In colorectal cancer, there is evidence of cancer relapse in patients who received transfusion. This retrospective analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between perioperative blood transfusion and cancer recurrence in patients undergoing oncosurgery.

methodsIn this case-control study, we retrospectively analysed the case sheets of 194 patients who had perioperative transfusion and underwent cancer surgery from March to December 2013(Study group, Cases). They were compared with controls matched for cancer site and TNM staging who did not receive perioperative transfusions (Control Group, Controls). We intended to find out if the Study group had any increased risk of cancer relapse compared with the controls. Records from the institute cancer registry were analysed in 2018 to give a follow-up period of 5 years. Continuous variables were analysed using Student's T test and Mann Whitney U test for normally distributed and skewed data respectively. For Categorical data Fisher's exact test and Chi square test were applied. The risk for recurrence was estimated using odds ratio.

resultsThe recurrence rate in cases and controls was 53.09% and 19.59% respectively and the odds ratio, 4.647 (CI: 2.954, 7.309). In Cases, significant relapse was noted for carcinomas of ovary, colorectal, bladder, larynx, head of pancreas and liver.

conclusionIn surgical oncology patients, ABT is associated with greater rate of recurrence.

Indexed as

Blood transfusionimmunosuppressionperioperative periodrecurrenceretrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID30745610
PMCPMC6341891
OpenAlexW2910469885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.