Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30745294›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2019

Spiraling in Control: Structures and Mechanisms of the Hsp104 Disaggregase.

James Shorter, Daniel R Southworth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proteostasis and ageing dissidence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hsp90, DnaK, and ClpB collaborate in protein reactivation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Design principles to tailor Hsp104 therapeutics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James ShorterDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Daniel R SouthworthDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics; and the Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158.
Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Defining the mechanistic basis of a prion disaggregaseR01GM099836 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHORTER, JAMES · 2013 to 2024
$3.9M
Defining the conformational cycle of nitric oxide synthasesR01GM110001 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SOUTHWORTH, DANIEL RYLAND · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099836NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hsp104 is a hexameric AAA

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateCryoelectron MicroscopyGlycoside HydrolasesHeat-Shock ProteinsHydrolysisMolecular ChaperonesPrionsProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein TransportSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateGlycoside HydrolasesHeat-Shock ProteinsHsP104 protein, S cerevisiaeMolecular ChaperonesPrionsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30745294
PMCPMC6671941
OpenAlexW2913971431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.