Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30744969›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

Neural Substrates of Drosophila Larval Anemotaxis.

Tihana Jovanic, Michael Winding, Albert Cardona, James W Truman, Marc Gershow, Marta Zlatic

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Compression-based inference of network motif sets.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nociception in fruit fly larvae.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Adaptation ofeLife · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tihana JovanicJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA. Electronic address: jovanict@janelia.hhmi.org.
Michael WindingJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
Albert CardonaJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA; Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
James W TrumanJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA; Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, Friday Harbor, WA 98250, USA.
Marc GershowDepartment of Physics, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Neuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: marc.gershow@nyu.edu.
Marta ZlaticJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA; Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: zlaticm@janelia.hhmi.org.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USNeurosciences Institute · US

Funding

Dissecting Olfactory Decision Making Using Optical NeurophysiologyDP2EB022359 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI GERSHOW, MARC HERMAN · 2015 to 2015
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteMedical Research Council MC_UP_1201/20NIBIB NIH HHS DP2 EB022359Wellcome Trust 205050/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals use sensory information to move toward more favorable conditions. Drosophila larvae can move up or down gradients of odors (chemotax), light (phototax), and temperature (thermotax) by modulating the probability, direction, and size of turns based on sensory input. Whether larvae can anemotax in gradients of mechanosensory cues is unknown. Further, although many of the sensory neurons that mediate taxis have been described, the central circuits are not well understood. Here, we used high-throughput, quantitative behavioral assays to demonstrate Drosophila larvae anemotax in gradients of wind speeds and to characterize the behavioral strategies involved. We found that larvae modulate the probability, direction, and size of turns to move away from higher wind speeds. This suggests that similar central decision-making mechanisms underlie taxis in somatosensory and other sensory modalities. By silencing the activity of single or very few neuron types in a behavioral screen, we found two sensory (chordotonal and multidendritic class III) and six nerve cord neuron types involved in anemotaxis. We reconstructed the identified neurons in an electron microscopy volume that spans the entire larval nervous system and found they received direct input from the mechanosensory neurons or from each other. In this way, we identified local interneurons and first- and second-order subesophageal zone (SEZ) and brain projection neurons. Finally, silencing a dopaminergic brain neuron type impairs anemotaxis. These findings suggest that anemotaxis involves both nerve cord and brain circuits. The candidate neurons and circuitry identified in our study provide a basis for future detailed mechanistic understanding of the circuit principles of anemotaxis.

Indexed as

WindAir MovementsAnimalsDrosophilaLarvaSensory Receptor CellsTaxis ResponseanemotaxisCNSDrosophila larvaneural substratessomatosensory processing

Identifiers

PMID30744969
PMCPMC6380933
OpenAlexW2911844507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.