Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30744697›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2019

Engaging men in an mHealth approach to support postpartum family planning among couples in Kenya: a qualitative study.

Elizabeth K Harrington, Erin E McCoy, Alison L Drake, Daniel Matemo, Grace John-Stewart, John Kinuthia, Jennifer A Unger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth K HarringtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Boxes 356460, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. harri@uw.edu.
Erin E McCoyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St., Boxes 356460, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Alison L DrakeDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave., Boxes 359909, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Daniel MatemoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Grace John-StewartDepartments of Global Health, Medicine, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave., Boxes 359909, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
John KinuthiaDepartment of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, PO Box 20723-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jennifer A UngerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave., Boxes 359909, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
University of Washington · USHarborview Medical Center · USKenyatta National Hospital · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

Optimizing repeat HIV testing during pregnancy and postpartum for PMTCTK01AI116298 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DRAKE, ALISON L · 2015 to 2019
$632k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI116298Society of Family Planning SFPRF16-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvolving male partners in family planning (FP) education and counseling may improve FP utilization and help meet couples' reproductive health needs in the postpartum period. We aimed to explore Kenyan men's and women's perspectives on an interactive short message service (SMS) approach to support postpartum FP decision-making, and inform intervention content for a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

methodsWe conducted four focus group discussions (FGD) among men (n = 35) and two among pregnant/postpartum women (n = 15) in western Kenya. Female participants were recruited at antenatal clinics; male participants were referred by antenatal attendees. FGDs included participant critique of pilot theory-based SMS messages. FGD transcripts were coded by two investigators and analyzed using an iterative, modified grounded theory approach. These data informed the intervention and RCT design, in which women had the option to refer male partners for trial enrollment.

resultsMen strongly desired inclusion in FP programs, and frequently discussed negative relationship consequences of women's covert contraceptive use. Female and male participants voiced a variety of concerns about contraceptive side effects and potential harms, which were central to narratives of community influence on personal contraceptive choices. Most participants felt that receiving FP-focused SMS and including men would be beneficial. They perceived that SMS dialogue with a nurse about FP could reduce misperceptions and may stimulate communication within couples, thereby improving contraceptive access and continuation. Shared decision-making around FP within couple relationships, in consultation with clinicians, was highly valued.

conclusionsHealth concerns about FP and limited couple communication are perceived contributors to postpartum unmet contraceptive need. With women's consent, the inclusion of male partners in FP services, and specifically in an mHealth SMS intervention, is acceptable and desired. Receiving SMS may trigger communication about postpartum FP within couples. SMS content should address contraceptive knowledge gaps, anticipated side effects and FP misperceptions, and allow for real-time method choice assistance.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPostpartum PeriodTelemedicineAdultContraception BehaviorCounselingDecision MakingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKenyaMaleMaternal Health ServicesMenQualitative ResearchCouplesFamily planningInnovationKenyaMen and family planningmHealthPostpartum contraceptionQualitativeSMS

Identifiers

PMID30744697
PMCPMC6371458
OpenAlexW2936431156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.