ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019
A bibliometric analysis of health-related literature on natural disasters from 1900 to 2017.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global landscape of COVID-19 research: a visualization analysis of randomized clinical trials.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Unveiling the hidden world of gut health: Exploring cutting-edge research through visualizing randomized controlled trials on the gut microbiota.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Comparing the prevalence of statistical reporting inconsistencies in COVID-19 preprints and matched controls: a registered report.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Global trends and hotspots of gastrointestinal microbiome and toxicity based on bibliometrics.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The development of new remote technologies in disaster medicine education: A scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Mapping the global research landscape on insulin resistance: Visualization and bibliometric analysis.World journal of diabetes · 2022Article
- Hospitals as disaster victims: Lessons not learned?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Review
- Chronic Diseases and Associated Risk Factors Among Adults in Puerto Rico After Hurricane Maria.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Analysis of the intellectual and social structure of health system response plan to earthquake studies adopting word co-occurrence and narrative approaches.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Research Studies Based on Federally Funded Children's Health Surveys.Academic pediatrics · 2021Article
- Trends in the Use of Sphingosine 1 Phosphate in Age-Related Diseases: A Scientometric Research Study (1992-2020).Journal of diabetes research · 2021Article
- Bibliometric analysis of global scientific literature on vaccine hesitancy in peer-reviewed journals (1990-2019).BMC public health · 2020Article
- Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on "sustainable development goals" with emphasis on "good health and well-being" goal (2015-2019).Globalization and health · 2020Article
- Rapid publishing in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).The Medical journal of Australia · 2020Article
- Integrating Unified Medical Language System and Kleinberg's Burst Detection Algorithm into Research Topics of Medications for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.Drug design, development and therapy · 2020Article
- Dissociation and disasters: A systematic review.World journal of psychiatry · 2019Article
- Nursing and midwifery research activity in Arab countries from 1950 to 2017.BMC health services research · 2019Review
- Topic Analysis of Nursing Research Using Co-Word Analysis.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, natural disasters have caused a large number of deaths and considerable morbidity. Nevertheless, limited information is available on how the health-related literature on natural disasters has evolved. The current study aims to assess the growth and pattern of health-related literature on natural disasters.
methodA bibliometric method was implemented using Scopus database for the period from 1900 to 2017. Keywords used in the search strategy were obtained from the classifications of natural disasters presented by the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. The health component was determined by selecting the health-related subject areas in Scopus.
resultsIn total, 9073 documents were retrieved. The annual number of publications showed a noticeable sharp increase after 2004. The retrieved documents received 97,605 citations, an average of 10.8 per document. The h-index of the retrieved documents was 113. Author keywords with the highest occurrence were 'earthquakes' followed by 'disaster medicine', 'disaster planning', 'tsunami', 'mental health', 'disaster preparedness', 'PTSD', 'emergency preparedness', and 'public health'. Authors from the United States of America contributed to 3127 (34.5%) publications and ranked first, followed by those from Japan (700; 7.7%) and China (636; 7.0%). When research output was standardised by Gross Domestic Product per capita, India ranked first, followed by China and the United States. The United Kingdom had the highest percentage of documents with international authors, followed by those from Switzerland and Canada. The Prehospital and Disaster Medicine journal published the most articles (636; 7.0%). The Sichuan University and its affiliated hospital contributed to 384 (7.0%) documents and ranked first in the field.
conclusionThe current baseline information on health-related literature on natural disasters showed that this field is growing rapidly but with inadequate international research collaboration. Research collaboration in this field needs to be strengthened to improve the global response to natural disasters in any place in the world. There is a need to expand the research focus in this field to include communicable and non-communicable diseases. Finally, the health effects of other natural disasters, such as floods, droughts and disease outbreaks, need to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.