Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30744581›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Understanding health behaviour in pregnancy and infant feeding intentions in low-income women from the UK through qualitative visual methods and application to the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour) model.

Aimee Grant, Melanie Morgan, Dawn Mannay, Dunla Gallagher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Barriers and facilitators to adopting healthier lifestyle among low-income women in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The lived experiences of women exploring a healthy lifestyle, gestational weight gain and physical activity throughout pregnancy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Breastfeeding trends, influences, and perceptions among Italian women: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aimee GrantCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK, Wales. GrantA2@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-5869
Melanie MorganCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK, Wales.
Dawn MannaySchool of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3WT, UK.
Dunla GallagherCentre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK, Ireland.
Cardiff University · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 105613/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth behaviours during pregnancy and the early years of life have been proven to affect long term health, resulting in investment in interventions. However, interventions often have low levels of completion and limited effectiveness. Consequently, it is increasingly important for interventions to be based on both behaviour change theories and techniques, and the accounts of pregnant women. This study engaged with pregnant women from deprived communities, to understand their subjective experiences of health in pregnancy.

methodsThe study adopted a women-centred ethos and recruited a purposive sample of ten pregnant women, who lived in deprived areas and were on low incomes. Participants engaged with three creative techniques of visual data production (timelines, collaging and dyad sandboxing), followed by elicitation interviews. One participant only engaged in the initial activity and interview, resulting in a total of 28 elicitation interviews. This in-depth qualitative approach was designed to enable a nuanced account of the participants' thoughts, everyday experiences and social relationships. Data were deductively coded for alcohol, smoking and infant feeding and then mapped to the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour).

resultsFive participants had experience of smoking during pregnancy, four had consumed alcohol during pregnancy, and all participants, except one who had exclusively formula fed her child, disclosed a range of infant feeding experiences and intentions for their current pregnancies. Considerable variation was identified between the drivers of behaviour around infant feeding and that related to abstinence from tobacco and alcohol during pregnancy. Overall, knowledge and confidence (psychological capability), the role of partners (social opportunity) and support from services to overcome physical challenges (environmental opportunity) were reported to impact on (reflective) motivation, and thus women's behaviour. The role of the public in creating and reinforcing stigma (social opportunity) was also noted in relation to all three behaviours.

conclusionsWhen designing new interventions to improve maternal health behaviours it is important to consider the accounts of pregnant women. Acknowledging pregnant women's subjective experiences and the challenges they face in negotiating acceptable forms of motherhood, can contribute to informed policy and practice, which can engage rather than isolate potential user groups.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorMotivationPovertyAttitude to HealthBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal BehaviorMothersPregnancyPregnant PeopleQualitative ResearchSocial SupportUnited KingdomAlcoholAntenatalBreastfeedingCOM-B modelCreative methodsInfant feedingPregnancyQualitativeSmokingVisual methods

Identifiers

PMID30744581
PMCPMC6371518
OpenAlexW2906188637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.