Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30744516›Full record

ReviewNordic journal of psychiatry2018

Overview of measurement-based positive psychiatry.

Graham M L Eglit, Barton W Palmer, Dilip V Jeste

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nordic journal of psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Patients' voices from music therapy at a South African psychiatric hospital.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2022
    Article
  3. Psychological Resilience to the Challenges of Physical Aging in Older U.S. Veterans: Results From the 2019-2020 National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  4. Navigating the Perfect Storm of Ageism, Mentalism, and Ableism: A Prevention Model.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Graham M L Eglita Department of Psychiatry , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Barton W Palmera Department of Psychiatry , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.
Dilip V Jestea Department of Psychiatry , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , CA , USA.

Funding

Research Methods CoreP30MH080002 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JESTE, DILIP V. · 2007 to 2011
$9.6M
FELLOWSHIP IN GERIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Elizabeth W Twamley · 1994 to 2026
$9.5M
CORE--RESEARCH NETWORK DEVELOPMENT COREP30MH066248 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JESTE, DILIP V. · 2002 to 2006
$7.4M
DVD Consent for Research in Older Schizophrenia PatientsR01MH067902 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JESTE, DILIP V. · 2004 to 2008
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH066248NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH080002NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067902NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatry has traditionally focused on studying psychopathology and treating mental illnesses to relieve symptoms and prevent relapse. Positive psychiatry seeks to expand the scope of psychiatry to broader aspects of mental health and well-being among individuals with or without mental illnesses. Positive psychosocial factors such as well-being, resilience, optimism, wisdom, and social support are central to positive psychiatry.

aimTo summarize the emerging science of positive psychiatry, emphasizing the use of measures of positive characteristics and outcomes relevant to mental health.

methodsOverview of recent research in positive psychiatry, focusing on measurements.

resultsPositive psychosocial factors are associated with better mental and physical health in diverse populations. Among individuals with serious mental illnesses, levels of these factors vary considerably, but positive psychiatry interventions can improve well-being and rates of recovery in at least subsets of the patients. A number of measures of positive factors and outcomes are available; most of them are based on self-reports, which have advantages as well as limitations.

conclusionsPositive psychiatry has the potential to improve the health and well-being of individuals with or without mental illnesses. Further research is needed to provide clinicians and investigators with a full tool-box of validated measures for positive psychosocial factors and outcomes. These measures should be subjected to rigorous psychometric evaluation across populations to help clarify mechanisms underlying positive factors, evaluate their longitudinal trajectories, and examine the impact of interventions on health and well-being over the lifespan in different clinical groups.

Indexed as

Mental HealthHumansMental DisordersPsychiatryPsychometricsPsychopathologyResilience, PsychologicalSocial Supportdepressionmental healthoptimismpsychological resiliencepsychometricssocial engagementWell-beingwisdom

Identifiers

PMID30744516
PMCPMC6373474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.