ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019
The Ethics of Human⁻Animal Relationships and Public Discourse: A Case Study of Lions Bred for Their Bones.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- To Farm or Not to Farm? Pilot Testing a Sentiocentric Ethical Framework for Farming Non-Typical Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Reviewing Evidence for the Impact of Lion Farming in South Africa on African Wild Lion Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Chains of Commerce: A Comprehensive Review of Animal Welfare Impacts in the International Wildlife Trade.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Contemporary Cultural Trade of Lion Body Parts.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Poor Welfare Indicators and Husbandry Practices at Lion (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Ending Commercial Lion Farming in South Africa: A Gap Analysis Approach.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Article
- Wildlife Farms, Stigma and Harm.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- African Lions and Zoonotic Diseases: Implications for Commercial Lion Farms in South Africa.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- Consequences Matter: Compassion in Conservation Means Caring for Individuals, Populations and Species.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Born captive: A survey of the lion breeding, keeping and hunting industries in South Africa.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conservation and natural resource management are increasingly attending the ethical elements of public decisions. Ethical considerations are challenging, in part, because they typically require accounting for the moral consideration of various human and nonhuman forms of life, whose interests sometimes conflict (or seem to conflict). A valuable tool for such evaluations is the formal analysis of ethical arguments. An ethical argument is a collection of premises, logically interrelated, to yield a conclusion that can be expressed in the form, "
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.