Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30744019›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

Rodents Versus Pig Model for Assessing the Performance of Serotype Chimeric Ad5/3 Oncolytic Adenoviruses.

Lisa Koodie, Matthew G Robertson, Malavika Chandrashekar, George Ruth, Michele Dunning, Richard W Bianco, Julia Davydova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa KoodieDivision of Basic and Translational Research, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455 MN, USA. kood0006@umn.edu.
Matthew G RobertsonDivision of Basic and Translational Research, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455 MN, USA. robe1414@umn.edu.
Malavika ChandrashekarDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455 MN, USA. chand374@umn.edu.
George RuthExperimental Surgical Services, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455 MN; USA. gruthvet@gmail.com.
Michele DunningExperimental Surgical Services, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455 MN; USA. dunni003@umn.edu.
Richard W BiancoExperimental Surgical Services, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455 MN; USA. Bianc001@umn.edu.
Julia DavydovaDivision of Basic and Translational Research, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455 MN, USA. davyd003@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

UAB / UMN SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA101955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KLUG, CHRISTOPHER · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
Combination therapy with IFN expressing oncolytic adenovirus for pancreatic cancerR01CA228760 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DAVYDOVA, JULIA, YAMAMOTO, MASATO · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
Novel Theranostics for Pancreatic CancerR01CA174861 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DAVYDOVA, JULIA · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174861NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228760NIH HHS P50CA101955NIH HHS R01CA174861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic adenoviruses (Ad) are promising tools for cancer therapeutics. Most Ad-based therapies utilize species C serotypes, with Adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) most commonly employed. Prior clinical trials demonstrated low efficiency of oncolytic Ad5 vectors, mainly due to the absence of Ad5 primary receptor (Coxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor, CAR) on cancer cells. Engineering serotype chimeric vectors (Ad5/3) to utilize Adenovirus type 3 (Ad3) receptors has greatly improved their oncolytic potential. Clinical translation of these infectivity-enhanced vectors has been challenging due to a lack of replication permissive animal models. In this study, we explored pigs as a model to study the performance of fiber-modified Ad5/3 chimeric vectors. As a control, the Ad5 fiber-unmodified virus was used. We analyzed binding, gene transfer, replication, and cytolytic ability of Ad5 and Ad5/3 in various non-human cell lines (murine, hamster, canine, porcine). Among all tested cell lines only porcine cells supported active binding and replication of Ad5/3. Syrian hamster cells supported Ad5 replication but showed no evidence of productive viral replication after infection with Ad5/3 vectors. Transduction and replication ability of Ad5/3 in porcine cells outperformed Ad5, a phenomenon often observed in human cancer cell lines. Replication of Ad5 and Ad5/3 was subsequently evaluated in vivo in immunocompetent pigs. Quantitative PCR analyses 7 days post infection revealed Ad5 and Ad5/3 DNA and replication-dependent luciferase activity in the swine lungs and spleen indicating active replication in these tissues. These studies demonstrated the flaws in using Syrian hamsters for testing serotype chimeric Ad5/3 vectors. This is the first report to validate the pig as a valuable model for preclinical testing of oncolytic adenoviruses utilizing Adenovirus type 3 receptors. We hope that these data will help to foster the clinical translation of oncolytic adenoviruses including those with Ad3 retargeted tropism.

Indexed as

Ad5/3animal modeloncolytic adenoviruspigporcinepreclinical modelreplicationserotype 3Species Bsyrian hamsters

Identifiers

PMID30744019
PMCPMC6406826
OpenAlexW2914566261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.