Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30743200›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019

Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Joy J Geng, Phillip Witkowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Looking into Working Memory to Verify Potential Search Targets.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Division and spreading of attention across color.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Searching near and far: The attentional template incorporates viewing distance.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prefrontal Cortex Codes Representations of Target Identity and Feature Uncertainty.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  18. Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joy J GengCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States; Department of Psychology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States. Electronic address: jgeng@ucdavis.edu.
Phillip WitkowskiCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States; Department of Psychology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, United States.

Funding

Vision Science Training Program: Cornea to CortexT32EY015387 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MARIE E BURNS · 2003 to 2026
$4.8M
Quantifying the attentional templateR01MH113855 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GENG, JOY JIA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY015387NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All models of attention include the concept of an attentional template (or a target or search template). The template is conceptualized as target information held in memory that is used for prioritizing sensory processing and determining if an object matches the target. It is frequently assumed that the template contains a veridical copy of the target. However, we review recent evidence showing that the template encodes a version of the target that is adapted to the current context (e.g. distractors, task, etc.); information held within the template may include only a subset of target features, real world knowledge, pre-existing perceptual biases, or even be a distorted version of the veridical target. We argue that the template contents are customized in order to maximize the ability to prioritize information that distinguishes targets from distractors. We refer to this as template-to-distractor distinctiveness and hypothesize that it contributes to visual search efficiency by exaggerating target-to-distractor dissimilarity.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalAttentionCuesHumansMemory, Short-TermVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID30743200
PMCPMC6625942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.