Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30742728›Full record

ArticleCancer science2019

Development of novel diagnostic system for pancreatic cancer, including early stages, measuring mRNA of whole blood cells.

Yoshio Sakai, Masao Honda, Shigeyuki Matsui, Osamu Komori, Toshinori Murayama, Tadami Fujiwara, Masaaki Mizuno, Yasuhito Imai, Kenichi Yoshimura, Alessandro Nasti and 20 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pancreatic Cancer: Nucleic Acid Drug Discovery and Targeted Therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Correction.Cancer science · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshio SakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0377-6130
Masao HondaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Shigeyuki MatsuiDepartment of Biostatistics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Osamu KomoriDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Seikei University, Seikei, Japan.
Toshinori MurayamaInnovative Clinical Research Center, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tadami FujiwaraCenter for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Masaaki MizunoCenter for Advanced Medicine and Clinical Research, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuhito ImaiInnovative Clinical Research Center, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kenichi YoshimuraInnovative Clinical Research Center, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Alessandro NastiSystem Biology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2550-2317
Takashi WadaDepartment of Nephrology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Noriho IidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Masaaki KitaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Rika HoriiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tamai ToshikatsuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Masashi NishikawaSystem Biology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hirofumi OkafujiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Eishiro MizukoshiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tatsuya YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Taro YamashitaDepartment of General Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kuniaki AraiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kazuya KitamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kazunori KawaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hajime TakatoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Tetsuro ShimakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Takeshi TerashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1052-0101
Tomoyuki HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kouki NioDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Shuichi KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hokuriku Liver Study Group
Kanazawa University Hospital · JPKanazawa University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPNagoya University · JPSeikei University · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and DevelopmentJapan Ministry of Health, Labour, and WelfareKanazawa University HospitalKUBIX Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most life-threating disease among all digestive system malignancies. We developed a blood mRNA PDAC screening system using real-time detection PCR to detect the expression of 56 genes, to discriminate PDAC from noncancer subjects. We undertook a clinical study to assess the performance of the developed system. We collected whole blood RNA from 53 PDAC patients, 102 noncancer subjects, 22 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 23 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms in a per protocol analysis. The sensitivity of the system for PDAC diagnosis was 73.6% (95% confidence interval, 59.7%-84.7%). The specificity for noncancer volunteers, chronic pancreatitis, and patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms was 64.7% (54.6%-73.9%), 63.6% (40.7%-82.8%), and 47.8% (26.8%-69.4%), respectively. Importantly, the sensitivity of this system for both stage I and stage II PDAC was 78.6% (57.1%-100%), suggesting that detection of PDAC by the system is not dependent on the stage of PDAC. These results indicated that the screening system, relying on assessment of changes in mRNA expression in blood cells, is a viable alternative screening strategy for PDAC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerAgedBlood CellsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence AnnotationNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsRNA, MessengerBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Messengerclinical trialin vitro diagnosticsmRNA screening systempancreas cancerwhole blood cells

Identifiers

PMID30742728
PMCPMC6447845
OpenAlexW2912559687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.