Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30742671›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Zika virus: Epidemiological surveillance of the Mexican Institute of Social Security.

Concepción Grajales-Muñiz, Víctor Hugo Borja-Aburto, David Alejandro Cabrera-Gaytán, Teresita Rojas-Mendoza, Lumumba Arriaga-Nieto, Alfonso Vallejos-Parás

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Epidemiological surveillance at IMSS: a review of institutional successes].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Symptoms of Arboviruses in Mexico.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Concepción Grajales-MuñizDivision of Epidemiological Surveillance of Communicable Diseases, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Ciudad de México, México.
Víctor Hugo Borja-AburtoUnit of Primary Health Care, IMSS, Ciudad de México, México.
David Alejandro Cabrera-GaytánDivision of Epidemiological Surveillance of Communicable Diseases, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Ciudad de México, México.
Teresita Rojas-MendozaDivision of Epidemiological Surveillance of Communicable Diseases, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Ciudad de México, México.
Lumumba Arriaga-NietoDivision of Epidemiological Surveillance of Communicable Diseases, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Ciudad de México, México.
Alfonso Vallejos-ParásDivision of Epidemiological Surveillance of Communicable Diseases, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-8295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAt the end of 2015, the first cases of Zika were identified in southern Mexico. During 2016, Zika spread as an outbreak to a large part of the country's coastal zones. METHODOLOGY: The Zika epidemiological surveillance system records cases with clinical symptoms of Zika virus disease (ZVD) and those confirmed by means of a reverse polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. This report includes the suspected and confirmed cases from 2016. Incidence rates were estimated by region and in pregnant women based on the proportion of confirmed cases.

resultsIn total, 43,725 suspected cases of ZVD were reported. The overall incidence of suspected cases of ZVD was 82.0 per 100,000 individuals and 25.3 per 100,000 Zika cases. There were 4,168 pregnant women with suspected symptoms of ZVD, of which infection was confirmed in 1,082 (26%). The estimated incidence rate of ZVD for pregnant women nationwide was 186.1 positive Zika cases per 100,000 pregnant women.

conclusionsThe incidence of Zika in Mexico is higher than that reported previously in the National System of Epidemiological Surveillance. Positive cases of Zika must be estimated and reported.

Indexed as

Academies and InstitutesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCongenital AbnormalitiesDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaleMexico

Identifiers

PMID30742671
PMCPMC6370238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.