Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30742650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Postoperative respiratory failure in liver transplantation: Risk factors and effect on prognosis.

Alfonso Wolfango Avolio, Rita Gaspari, Luciana Teofili, Giuseppe Bianco, Giorgia Spinazzola, Paolo Maurizio Soave, Gianfranco Paiano, Alessandra Gioia Francesconi, Andrea Arcangeli, Nicola Nicolotti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alfonso Wolfango AvolioFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Department of Surgery -Transplantation Service, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2491-7625
Rita GaspariUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Luciana TeofiliUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7214-1561
Giuseppe BiancoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Department of Surgery -Transplantation Service, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7451-4002
Giorgia SpinazzolaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Paolo Maurizio SoaveFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Gianfranco PaianoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra Gioia FrancesconiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Andrea ArcangeliUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Nicola NicolottiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Rome, Italy.
Massimo AntonelliUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative respiratory failure (PRF, namely mechanical ventilation >48 hours) significantly affects morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LTx). Previous studies analyzed only one or two categories of PRF risk factors (preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative ones). The aims of this study were to identify PRF predictors, to assess the length of stay (LoS) in ICU and the 90-day survival according to the PRF in LTx patients.

methodsTwo classification approaches were used: systematic classification (recipient-related preoperative factors; intraoperative factors; logistic factors; donor factors; postoperative ICU factors; postoperative surgical factors) and patient/organ classification (patient-related general factors; native-liver factors; new-liver factors; kidney factors; heart factors; brain factors; lung factors). Two hundred adult non-acute patients were included. Missing analysis was performed. The competitive role of each factor was assessed.

resultsPRF occurred in 36.0% of cases. Among 28 significant PRF predictors at univariate analysis, 6 were excluded because of collinearity, 22 were investigated by ROC curves and by logistic regression analysis. Recipient age (OR = 1.05; p = 0.010), female sex (OR = 2.75; p = 0.018), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD, OR = 1.09; p<0.001), restrictive lung pattern (OR = 2.49; p = 0.027), intraoperative veno-venous bypass (VVBP, OR = 3.03; p = 0.008), pre-extubation PaCO2 (OR = 1.11; p = 0.003) and Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF, OR = 1.37; p<0.001) resulted independent PRF risk factors. As compared to patients without PRF, the PRF-group had longer LoS (10 days IQR 7-18 versus 5 days IQR 4-7, respectively; p<0.001) and lower day-90 survival (86.0% versus 97.6% respectively, p<0.001).

conclusionIn conclusion, MELD, restrictive lung pattern, surgical complexity as captured by VVBP, pre-extubation PaCO2 and MEAF are the main predictors of PRF in non-acute LTx patients.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLength of StayLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRespiratory InsufficiencyRisk FactorsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30742650
PMCPMC6370207
OpenAlexW2911308598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.