Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30742643›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Minimal medical imaging can accurately reconstruct geometric bone models for musculoskeletal models.

Edin K Suwarganda, Laura E Diamond, David G Lloyd, Thor F Besier, Ju Zhang, Bryce A Killen, Trevor N Savage, David J Saxby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edin K SuwargandaSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5467-8760
Laura E DiamondSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2197-1856
David G LloydSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0824-9682
Thor F BesierAuckland Bioengineering Institute and Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ju ZhangAuckland Bioengineering Institute and Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Bryce A KillenSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6389-2497
Trevor N SavageSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6608-8664
David J SaxbySchool of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-7518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate representation of subject-specific bone anatomy in lower-limb musculoskeletal models is important for human movement analyses and simulations. Mathematical methods can reconstruct geometric bone models using incomplete imaging of bone by morphing bone model templates, but the validity of these methods has not been fully explored. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal imaging requirements for accurate reconstruction of geometric bone models. Complete geometric pelvis and femur models of 14 healthy adults were reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging through segmentation. From each complete bone segmentation, three sets of incomplete segmentations (set 1 being the most incomplete) were created to test the effect of imaging incompleteness on reconstruction accuracy. Geometric bone models were reconstructed from complete sets, three incomplete sets, and two motion capture-based methods. Reconstructions from (in)complete sets were generated using statistical shape modelling, followed by host-mesh and local-mesh fitting through the Musculoskeletal Atlas Project Client. Reconstructions from motion capture-based methods used positional data from skin surface markers placed atop anatomic landmarks and estimated joint centre locations as target points for statistical shape modelling and linear scaling. Accuracy was evaluated with distance error (mm) and overlapping volume similarity (%) between complete bone segmentation and reconstructed bone models, and statistically compared using a repeated measure analysis of variance (p<0.05). Motion capture-based methods produced significantly higher distance error than reconstructions from (in)complete sets. Pelvis volume similarity reduced significantly with the level of incompleteness: complete set (92.70±1.92%), set 3 (85.41±1.99%), set 2 (81.22±3.03%), set 1 (62.30±6.17%), motion capture-based statistical shape modelling (41.18±9.54%), and motion capture-based linear scaling (26.80±7.19%). A similar trend was observed for femur volume similarity. Results indicate that imaging two relevant bone regions produces overlapping volume similarity >80% compared to complete segmented bone models, and improve analyses and simulation over current standard practice of linear scaling musculoskeletal models.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicModels, BiologicalMusclesAdultAtlases as TopicFemurHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, StatisticalOrgan SizePelvis

Identifiers

PMID30742643
PMCPMC6370181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.