ArticlePloS one2019
Minimal medical imaging can accurately reconstruct geometric bone models for musculoskeletal models.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproducible Research: Computational Design of Personalized Clinical Treatments for Walking Impairments Using the Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Reconstruction of Scapula Bone Shapes from Digitized Skin Landmarks Using Statistical Shape Modeling and Multiple Linear Regression.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- EMG-Informed Neuromusculoskeletal Simulations Increase the Accuracy of the Estimation of Knee Joint Contact Forces During Sub-optimal Level Walking.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- The Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline: MATLAB-based model personalization and treatment optimization functionality for OpenSim.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- OpenHands: An Open-Source Statistical Shape Model of the Finger Bones.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Database of segmentations and surface models of bones of the entire lower body created from cadaver CT scans.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Shape differences in the semitendinosus following tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023Article
- Multi-level personalization of neuromusculoskeletal models to estimate physiologically plausible knee joint contact forces in children.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2022Article
- Modelling Human Locomotion to Inform Exercise Prescription for Osteoporosis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020Review
- Development and validation of statistical shape models of the primary functional bone segments of the foot.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Comparison of cartilage and bone morphological models of the ankle joint derived from different medical imaging technologies.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling-Based Prostheses for Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate representation of subject-specific bone anatomy in lower-limb musculoskeletal models is important for human movement analyses and simulations. Mathematical methods can reconstruct geometric bone models using incomplete imaging of bone by morphing bone model templates, but the validity of these methods has not been fully explored. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimal imaging requirements for accurate reconstruction of geometric bone models. Complete geometric pelvis and femur models of 14 healthy adults were reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging through segmentation. From each complete bone segmentation, three sets of incomplete segmentations (set 1 being the most incomplete) were created to test the effect of imaging incompleteness on reconstruction accuracy. Geometric bone models were reconstructed from complete sets, three incomplete sets, and two motion capture-based methods. Reconstructions from (in)complete sets were generated using statistical shape modelling, followed by host-mesh and local-mesh fitting through the Musculoskeletal Atlas Project Client. Reconstructions from motion capture-based methods used positional data from skin surface markers placed atop anatomic landmarks and estimated joint centre locations as target points for statistical shape modelling and linear scaling. Accuracy was evaluated with distance error (mm) and overlapping volume similarity (%) between complete bone segmentation and reconstructed bone models, and statistically compared using a repeated measure analysis of variance (p<0.05). Motion capture-based methods produced significantly higher distance error than reconstructions from (in)complete sets. Pelvis volume similarity reduced significantly with the level of incompleteness: complete set (92.70±1.92%), set 3 (85.41±1.99%), set 2 (81.22±3.03%), set 1 (62.30±6.17%), motion capture-based statistical shape modelling (41.18±9.54%), and motion capture-based linear scaling (26.80±7.19%). A similar trend was observed for femur volume similarity. Results indicate that imaging two relevant bone regions produces overlapping volume similarity >80% compared to complete segmented bone models, and improve analyses and simulation over current standard practice of linear scaling musculoskeletal models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.