Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30742640›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Viable Neisseria meningitidis is commonly present in saliva in healthy young adults: Non-invasive sampling and enhanced sensitivity of detection in a follow-up carriage study in Portuguese students.

Fernanda Rodrigues, Hannah Christensen, Begonia Morales-Aza, Paulina Sikora, Elizabeth Oliver, Jennifer Oliver, Jay Lucidarme, Robin Marlow, Luís Januário, Adam Finn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lung abscess due to Neisseria meningitidis serogroup X-unexpected virulence of a commensal resulting from putative serogroup B capsular switching.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Asymptomatic carriers ofNew microbes and new infections · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fernanda RodriguesHospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5820-5215
Hannah ChristensenSchool of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Begonia Morales-AzaSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Paulina SikoraSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth OliverSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jennifer OliverSchool of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jay LucidarmeMeningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Robin MarlowSchool of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Luís JanuárioHospital Pediátrico, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Adam FinnSchool of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimsImproved sensitivity and efficiency of detection and quantification of carriage of Neisseria meningitidis (Nm) in young people is important for evaluation of the impact of vaccines upon transmission and associated population-wide effects. Saliva collection is quick, non-invasive and facilitates frequent sampling, but has been reported to yield low sensitivity by culture. We re-evaluated this approach in a follow-up cross sectional study using direct and culture-amplified PCR. MATERIAL/

methodsIn April 2016 we collected paired oropharyngeal swabs (OPS) and saliva samples from 1005 healthy students in Portugal into STGG broth and stored them at -80°C until DNA extraction and batched qPCR analysis. Samples were also cultured on GC agar plates for 72h and PCR done on DNA extracts from overall growth. Nm isolates were also sought from a selection of 50 samples. qPCR amplification targets were superoxide dismutase sodC and capsular locus/genogroup-specific genes (B, C, W, X and Y) and, for cultured isolates only, porA. Cycle threshold values of ≤36 were considered positive.

results556 tests (460 samples, 363 subjects, 36.1%) were positive for Nm (sodC) and 65 (45, 36, 3.6%) for MenB. More salivas were positive by direct sodC qPCR (211, 21.0%) than OPS (126, 12.5%) but fewer were positive by culture-amplified qPCR (94 vs. 125). For both sample types, many that were negative on direct qPCR came positive on culture-amplification and Nm was consistently isolated from salivas in which culture amplified the PCR signal. Using both methods on both samples yielded 36.1% Nm and 5.5% encapsulated Nm carriage rates while direct qPCR on OPS alone detected 12.5% and 2.2%.

conclusionsDetectable MenB carriage rates (2.9%) were lower than 4 years earlier (6.8%) in this population (p = 0.0003). Viable meningococci were often present in saliva. Although evidence of encapsulated Nm was less frequent in saliva than OPS, collection is more acceptable to subjects allowing more frequent sampling. Use of culture-amplification increases detection sensitivity in both sample types, especially when combined with direct PCR. Combining these samples and/or methodologies could greatly enhance the power of carriage studies to detect the impact of vaccines upon carriage and transmission.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsCarrier StateCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMeningitis, MeningococcalMiddle AgedNeisseria meningitidisPolymerase Chain ReactionPortugalSalivaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30742640
PMCPMC6370198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.