Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30742250›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2019

Multidisciplinary decision-making in mitral valve disease: the mitral valve heart team.

S Heuts, J R Olsthoorn, S M M Hermans, S A F Streukens, J Vainer, E C Cheriex, P Segers, J G Maessen, P Sardari Nia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The current state of the multidisciplinary heart team approach: a systematic review.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Heart teams in the Netherlands: From teamwork to data‑driven decision-making.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The mitral paradox of choice.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S HeutsDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J R OlsthoornDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S M M HermansDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S A F StreukensDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J VainerDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
E C CheriexDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P SegersDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J G MaessenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P Sardari NiaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. peyman.sardarinia@mumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough decision-making using the heart-team approach is apparently intuitive and has a class I recommendation in most recent guidelines, supportive data is still lacking. The current study aims to demonstrate the individualised clinical pathway for mitral valve disease patients and to evaluate the outcome of all patients referred to the dedicated mitral valve heart team.

methodsAll patients who were evaluated for mitral valve pathology with or without concomitant cardiac disease between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 were prospectively followed and included. Patients were evaluated, and a treatment strategy was determined by the dedicated mitral valve heart team.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-eight patients were included; 67 patients were treated surgically (isolated and concomitant surgery), 20 by transcatheter interventions and 71 conservatively. Surgically treated patients had a higher 30-day mortality rate (4.4%), which decreased when specified to a dedicated surgeon (1.7%) and in primary, elective cases (0%). This was also observed for major adverse events within 30 days. Residual mitral regurgitation >grade 2 was more frequent in the catheter-based intervention group (23.5%) compared to the surgical group (4.8%).

conclusionIn conclusion, the implementation of a multidisciplinary heart team for mitral valve disease is a valuable approach for the selection of patients for different treatment modalities. Our research group will focus on a future comparative study using historical cohorts to prove the potential superiority of the dedicated multidisciplinary heart-team approach.

Indexed as

Decision-makingHeart teamMitral valve diseaseMultidisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID30742250
PMCPMC6439106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.