ArticleScientific reports2019
Phytochemical characterization and comparative studies of four Cecropia species collected in Panama using multivariate data analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring phytochemical variability in Iranian Acanthophyllum (Caryophyllaceae) species: insights for enhanced medicinal and industrial utilization.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Terpenes fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The artificial neural network selects saccharides from natural sources a promise for potential FimH inhibitor to prevent UTI infections.In silico pharmacology · 2024Article
- Intra- and Interspecies Differences of TwoPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Saponin and Fatty Acid Profiling of the Sea CucumberNutrients · 2023Article
- A High-Content Screen for the Identification of Plant Extracts with Insulin Secretion-Modulating Activity.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Occurrence and Biological Activity of Tormentic Acid-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Integrated Analysis of the Transcriptome and Metabolome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- 1H NMR metabolic phenotyping of Dipterocarpus alatus as a novel tool for age and growth determination.PloS one · 2020Article
- Isolation of Phytochemicals fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant species of the genus Cecropia (Urticaceae) are used as traditional medicine in Latin-America, and are commercially available as food supplements. The aim of this study was to characterize and compare the phytochemical constituents of four Cecropia species collected in Panama. The structures of 11 compounds isolated from leaves of C. obtusifolia were elucidated based on high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic analysis; the polyphenolic constituents of leaves of all four Cecropia species and commercial products were characterized using high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-quadrupole time of flight-tandem high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-DAD-QTOF). Forty-seven compounds were fully identified or tentatively characterized. Thirty-nine of these have not been previously reported for the species under investigation. Multivariate analysis revelead that C. obtusifolia and C. insignis are the most related species, while C. hispidissima is the most segregated one. Considering the importance of the description of novel chemical entities and the increasing interest and use of natural products, this study may be of great help for chemotaxonomic purposes, the interpretation of medicinal properties and for quality assessment of herbal supplements containing Cecropia leaves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.