ArticlePediatric pulmonology2019
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and exercise capacity, a longitudinal evaluation.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06448520 (Reference Values for the Muscle Power Sprint Test in Children Aged 5-12 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reference Values for the Muscle Power Sprint Test in Children Aged 5-12 Years
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness of Exercise in Improving Lung Function in Children with Post-operative Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Quality of life in congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors treated at a non-ECMO centre from 1998 to 2015: a cross-sectional study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- The heart in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Knowns, unknowns, and future priorities.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Clinical Outcomes in Children with Foregut Anomalies.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Persisting Motor Function Problems in School-Aged Survivors of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and exercise capacity, a longitudinal evaluation.Pediatric pulmonology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChildren with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) suffer from long-term pulmonary morbidity. Longitudinal data of exercise capacity in these children are lacking. We hypothesized that exercise capacity would be impaired in children with CDH and deteriorates over time. We evaluated exercise capacity and its determinants in CDH patients longitudinally until 12 years of age.
designProspective longitudinal follow-up study in tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and fourteen children with CDH born between 1999 and 2012.
methodsExercise capacity was evaluated using the Bruce treadmill-protocol at the ages of 5, 8, and 12 years. Primary outcome parameter was standard deviation score (SDS) of maximal endurance time. Data were analyzed by using linear mixed models.
resultsA total of 107 children (30 treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) performed 191 reliable exercise tests. At ages 5, 8, and 12 years, the mean (95%CI) SDS endurance time was -0.44 (-0.65 to -0.24); -1.01 (-1.23 to -0.78); -1.10 (-1.40 to -0.80), respectively, all less than zero (P < 0.001). Exercise capacity declined significantly over time irrespective of ECMO-treatment (5-12 years: non-ECMO P = 0.015; ECMO P = 0.006). Duration of initial hospital stay and diffusion capacity corrected for alveolar volume were associated with SDS endurance time (P < 0.001 and P = 0.039).
conclusionsIn CDH patients exercise capacity deteriorates between 5 and 12 years of age, irrespective of ECMO-treatment. CDH patients may benefit from long-term assessments of exercise capacity with timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.