Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30741375›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2019

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Validates the Use of Diagnostic Biopsies as a Suitable Alternative to Resection Material for Mutation Screening in Colorectal Cancer.

Hersh A Ham-Karim, Henry Okuchukwu Ebili, Kirsty Manger, Wakkas Fadhil, Narmeen S Ahmad, Susan D Richman, Mohammad Ilyas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hersh A Ham-KarimDivision of Pathology, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Henry Okuchukwu EbiliDivision of Pathology, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. Henry.Ebili@nottingham.ac.uk.
Kirsty MangerCentre for Medical Genetics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Wakkas FadhilDivision of Pathology, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Narmeen S AhmadClinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Susan D RichmanDepartment of Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Mohammad IlyasDivision of Pathology, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBKurdistan Institute for Strategic Studies and Scientific ResearchNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N005953/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutation testing in the context of neoadjuvant therapy must be performed on biopsy samples. Given the issue of tumour heterogeneity, this raises the question of whether the biopsies are representative of the whole tumour. Here we have compared the mutation profiles of colorectal biopsies with their matched resection specimens.

methodsWe performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis on 25 paired formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer biopsy and primary resection samples. DNA was extracted and analysed using the TruSight tumour kit, allowing the interrogation of 26 cancer driver genes. Samples were run on an Illumina MiSeq. Mutations were validated using quick-multiplex-consensus (QMC)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in conjunction with high resolution melting (HRM). The paired biopsy and resection tumour samples were assessed for presence or absence of mutations, mutant allele frequency ratios, and allelic imbalance status.

resultsA total of 81 mutations were detected, in ten of the 26 genes in the TruSight kit. Two of the 25 paired cases were wild-type across all genes. The mutational profiles, allelic imbalance status, and mutant allele frequency ratios of the paired biopsy and resection samples were highly concordant (88.75-98.85%), with all but three (3.7%) of the mutations identified in the resection specimens also being present in the biopsy specimens. All 81 mutations were confirmed by QMC-PCR and HRM analysis, although four low-level mutations required a co-amplification at lower denaturation temperature (COLD)-PCR protocol to enrich for the mutant alleles.

conclusionsDiagnostic biopsies are adequate and reliable materials for molecular testing by NGS. The use of biopsies for molecular screening will enhance targeted neoadjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMutationAllelesBiopsyColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30741375
OpenAlexW2913402061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.