Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30740918›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2019

From isolated structures to continuous networks: A categorization of cytoskeleton-based motile engineered biological microstructures.

Rachel Andorfer, Joshua D Alper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel AndorferDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Joshua D AlperDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-8694

Funding

The role of acetate fermentation in Entamoeba histolytica growth and infectionP20GM109094 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, MEREDITH T · 2016 to 2020
$10.4M
Targeting flagellar motility in the treatment of kinetoplastid diseasesR15AI137979 · NIAID · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI SANABRIA, HUGO · 2019 to 2019
$437k
NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI137979NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109094NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM109094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As technology at the small scale is advancing, motile engineered microstructures are becoming useful in drug delivery, biomedicine, and lab-on-a-chip devices. However, traditional engineering methods and materials can be inefficient or functionally inadequate for small-scale applications. Increasingly, researchers are turning to the biology of the cytoskeleton, including microtubules, actin filaments, kinesins, dyneins, myosins, and associated proteins, for both inspiration and solutions. They are engineering structures with components that range from being entirely biological to being entirely synthetic mimics of biology and on scales that range from isotropic continuous networks to single isolated structures. Motile biological microstructures trace their origins from the development of assays used to study the cytoskeleton to the array of structures currently available today. We define 12 types of motile biological microstructures, based on four categories: entirely biological, modular, hybrid, and synthetic, and three scales: networks, clusters, and isolated structures. We highlight some key examples, the unique functionalities, and the potential applications of each microstructure type, and we summarize the quantitative models that enable engineering them. By categorizing the diversity of motile biological microstructures in this way, we aim to establish a framework to classify these structures, define the gaps in current research, and spur ideas to fill those gaps. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Cells at the Nanoscale Biology-Inspired Nanomaterials > Protein and Virus-Based Structures Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies.

Indexed as

BioengineeringBiomimeticsCytoskeletonMicrotubulesMuscle ProteinsAnimalsBiomimetic MaterialsHumansModels, BiologicalMuscle Proteinsactive matterbiomimicrybiomolecular motor proteincytoskeletal networksmicroscale devices

Identifiers

PMID30740918
PMCPMC6881777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.